Alteryx Analytics Cloud Product Ideas

We would like to be able to split users into different user groups within the same workspace. Permissions to view and edit outputs, job runs and flows (including for administrators) would be allocated on a user group level (e.g. so one user group can edit flows, the associated job runs and outputs while other groups can only view them). Administrators would be allocated to a particular user group and their admin rights would apply to their own group only.

Standardize is an amazing function! ... if you know that you won't have any more values added to a column later. With standardize, it's impossible to account for future source values.

It would be super helpful if there were a way to add additional Source Values (and, accordingly, New Values for those source values) to account for values that might appear in the future (but aren't in your data right now).

I realize there are already a number of ways to account for "future" values. Some examples include if...then...else, condition column > case on single column, condition column > case on custom column. However, these transforms are not friendly for those unfamiliar with coding in low-code tools, and this no-code upgrade to Standardize could help these users.

When i use Dataprep full day, i would prefer to have a dark theme to preserve my eyes ! If we could swith between a dark or a light theme, it would be the best solution !

:-)

PS : Sorry for my bad English, I'm a French user.

Right now there is no place where team members can collectively create flows and share at one place. If given the option to share the Folders among different members just like we have for flows it will be lot easier. For Example: If there is a folder with 4 different flows, and I share the folder with my team mates they can edit and created new flows over there and can see all the 4 different flows already present. But if out of 4 flows if I share 2 flows with someone, they see the folder but they don't see the flows not shared with them.

Please add features to your current "Folder" feature by allowing us to share them with other users, move a flow that has been "shared" with us from the root folder to a sub-folder, etc.

Someone has already submitted an idea for multiple levels of sub-folders which was another request that we had. Thanks.

Parquet has been more performant than publishing to csv and love to have this feature implemented

We use heavily Tibco Data Virtualization server views and web services in our organization.

We need to have official connector supported by Trifacta to connect and fetch data from those.

When I'm on the Flow workspace, if I do a click on a recipe, the steps displays on the float right box.

Unfortunately, i'can't select and copy steps :-/

I'm forced to load the recipe to copy steps before past it in another recipe. I think that everyone would gain some time to copy steps directly from the Flow view !

:-)

PS : Sorry for my bad English, I'm a French user.

There is no explicit sharing functionality for user macros between users or groups of users. Currently, the closest thing is users gain access to an owner’s macros within a flow once the flow is shared with them. It would be good to be able to share macros in the same way that users can share flows.

Currently, when pivoting a specific field into multiple columns, all other fields you want present in the resulting table must be individually added to "row labels".

First off - It is very time consuming when you have a lot of columns to add.

Secondly - When new columns are added in the source data, these new fields are not automatically included. When this happens we need to:

1. re-sample the data,
2. make sure the new column is present,
3. manually add it to the list in the row labels.

When using an automation tool such as Trifacta I would expect that my flow can deal with new columns being added without having to go and fix my flow every time. Adding an option to add "All other fields" or being able to select the Fields to exclude would make this process much smoother and it would ensure that our flow is future proof.

Currently is scheduling allowed only on Instance level.

The request is to be able to allow scheduling for particular user, instead for all instance users.

Use a linked datasets created by GCP Analytic Hub as data source in DataPrep. Detailed informations in link below:

Can I use linked dataset (created by Analytic Hub in GCP) to build flows in DataPrep? (trifacta.com)

We often use hashing functions like fingerprint in SQL (Big Query) to mark or identify rows that match for specific attributes or to generate UUIDs. I know it's possible to do so by adding UDFs, but it would be more convenient to have a native function.

A client is organizationally structured where GCP project administration is separated from tool (Dataprep) administration. Currently, usage charts are only visible in the admin console which is only accessible by project admins. We would like an additional IAM role or an ability to see usage charts without the ability to make project changes.

We would like to connect Trifacta to a SharePoint file in a folder.

Please redirect the user back to the page where the session has expired, instead of redirecting to home once the user re-authenticates.

Current scenario we are seeing that the user will be redirected to home page instead of the page he was in when the session has expired after set time in the config, in my case after 30 mins. ( this is because sometime user goes to a meeting forgets about the page he was working and he has to re-open everything from home page after re-auth )

Hi,

I use the import by folder for GCS files to import many files in one time (present and futurs files droped in the same folder). Somtimes, the dataschema of files is not exactly the same for all the files but the columns names are always the same ! I'would like to use the "union by name" for the first union of the many files included in the folder that i've imported. With this function, if the dataschema change in the futur, my importation will be ok whatever !

We could have a screen like "recipe union screen" for the "import with union" (for the inports by folder) to select the columns to import and the type of matching for exemple... 

This is a real issue for me because when the datascema of one file has changed, the scheduled RUNs are KO...

Sorry for my bad English, I'm French :-)

Thanks !

As far as I know, the current error logs for a failed Trifacta job do not tell the user which recipe, which recipe step, and on what data the error was thrown.

This lack of basic information on the Trifacta level makes it hard for a normal user to debug Trifacta jobs. Typically, I will have to work backwards in the flow, attaching and running an output for each recipe until I can find the culprit recipe causing the issues. Then, I will have to disable steps one by one until I find the step that causes the recipe to fail. This is time and resource consuming.

As for the offending data triggering the problem, I still don't know how to get that, and that's actually crucially important for an ongoing issue we're having with Spark execution.

Therefore, I suggest that improved and simplified error logging would be very helpful in fixing problems in the future. Thank you for your consideration.

Support for reading XML files natively with Trifacta.