Free Trial

Weekly Challenges

Solve the challenge, share your solution and summit the ranks of our Community!

Also available in | Français | Português | Español | 日本語
IDEAS WANTED

Want to get involved? We're always looking for ideas and content for Weekly Challenges.

SUBMIT YOUR IDEA

Challenge #157: An Expert Challenge

Erin
10 - Fireball

really HATE how amazingly simple this one turned out to be. Wow. 🙄 I know I tend to make things more complicated than it needs to be, but sheeeeewwwwwy ......

 

Spoiler
157.png
I figured out step 1 all by myself, so proud. Totally skipped over step 2 because I'm silly. Collinearity is only mentioned in every single predictive article / training / help reference out there. The Chi-Sq effect had me all tripped up. It's referenced for individual variables in the distribution analysis, but not for overall models. If only I had taken a step back and realized we were comparing two models where one is the subset of the other, the very use case for a nested test. How often do you get to use a nested test? That depends, how often do you study for the expert exam? 😏

 

Bobbyt23
12 - Quasar

This was completely out side my comfort zone. I am definitely not a predictive tools master!

martinson
11 - Bolide

Never had a challenge that requires so few tools take so long

Cheers,
martinson

LinkedIN

Bulien
Pilsner
11 - Bolide

Another great challenge, great to get some experience of official Expert level questions too. 

Spoiler
Had to do some googling to get a solution on this one. I was initially confused when there was no model suggested for the second part of the question but realised that was part of the challenge. I've tried to include some brief reasoning for my choice of logistic regression, (not certain its correct reasoning but its the thought process i went through).
157.png

alexnajm
18 - Pollux
18 - Pollux

Done!

lwolfie
11 - Bolide

I will definitely need to study predictive analytics more!