This site uses different types of cookies, including analytics and functional cookies (its own and from other sites). To change your cookie settings or find out more, click here. If you continue browsing our website, you accept these cookies.
ALTERYX INSPIRE | Join us this May for for a multi-day virtual analytics + data science experience like no other! Register Now
1 Day Left! - The Alteryx Community will be temporarily unavailable for a few hours due to implementation of the new SSO experience starting tomorrow at 5pm MDT. Please plan accordingly. For more information, read the blog.
@jdunkerley79 a big win for AMP today. I took yours and got ~26s without it and ~12s with it. I think the big difference was being able to run the iterative macros in parallel. I've just tried with/without on mine and got similar numbers.
Help! For Part A I built a batch macro within an iterative macro which worked fine for the example on the main page (the 10 x 10 grid). It gave me 37 occupied seats as the answer and ran 5 iterations, just like the example.
I've now fed in the full puzzle data and I'm on iteration 68 after 60 minutes run time. Can someone who has solved part A please tell me if I should persevere or bail out!? I feel like I should bail but I just can't let go! Someone please put me out of my misery... 😂
EDIT: nevermind - I persevered and it worked (woo!) but I will need to change tactic and/or streamline my macros if I'm going to get much further with AOC!
@Balders It's even worse than that - I get multiple different wrong answers! Now of course this is kind of my fault since I am the original architect of e2 (pre AMP) - not that I have been involved for several years. That said, digging in I have found at least 3 issues in AMP with this one workflow!