Advent of Code is back! Unwrap daily challenges to sharpen your Alteryx skills and earn badges along the way! Learn more now.
Community is experiencing an influx of spam. As we work toward a solution, please use the 'Notify Moderator' option on the ellipsis menu to flag inappropriate posts.
Weekly Challenges
Solve the challenge, share your solution and summit the ranks of our Community!Also available in | Français | Português | Español | 日本語
IDEAS WANTED
Want to get involved? We're always looking for ideas and content for Weekly Challenges.
SUBMIT YOUR IDEA
Welcome to the Weekly Challenge. Each week Alteryx post a use case where you can put your Alteryx skills to the test. You'll be able to share your answers and collaborate with other challengers to arrive at an answer. Participation will be rewarded - just make sure you are attaching your Alteryx ...
My results are slightly different (off by about 1/100th of a mile). I assume this is because I used a formulaic approach rather than a geometric one.
Spoiler
I used the Destination Point given distance and bearing from start point from this site: http://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong.html for my formulas.
I was able to make a workflow to match the compare solution
I couldn't help but to notice in the compare solution the angle of the extended line slightly different from the actual line.
Bit unsatisfied because of that. I would like to try it again and get the angle of extended line same as actual line.
