Challenge #243: Odd Man Out
Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
mustel
8 - Asteroid
11-26-2020
05:46 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
rmassambane
10 - Fireball
11-26-2020
10:46 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Romy
7 - Meteor
11-26-2020
05:28 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
naresh5315
7 - Meteor
11-26-2020
07:54 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
TonyA
Alteryx Alumni (Retired)
11-27-2020
12:18 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Found the same difference as many of the others.
Spoiler
El Salvador is a tie for 2030 and 2035 (within a couple of ten-thousandths of a percent)
Tyro_abc
11 - Bolide
11-27-2020
07:40 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Spoiler
The answer would differ based on when you apply the "current year" filter. If you take the latest year for a country where the number of males is greater than that of females and then apply the current year filter, you would get the result as shown in the original post.
But if the sequence of filters is altered, we would get the result as explained by @Blake. As we are supposed to take the latest year( in past ), we should apply the current year filter before applying the other filter (number of male > number of female).
But if the sequence of filters is altered, we would get the result as explained by @Blake. As we are supposed to take the latest year( in past ), we should apply the current year filter before applying the other filter (number of male > number of female).
A.Current Year Filter after getting the latest year where num of male > num of female:
1.
2.
3.
B. If current year filter is applied before getting the latest year where num of male > num of female
atcodedog05
22 - Nova
11-28-2020
02:32 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
aesanchez
7 - Meteor
11-28-2020
03:35 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Fun thing! First challenge.
Same results as @Blake, the first to answer.
mbogusz
9 - Comet
11-29-2020
08:31 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Way to land Answer1 @AkimasaKajitani with the 'Consecutive' column as a filter. I'm still not sure what that's trying to show, but you got it.
Here is my solution with the alternative to Answer1
AkimasaKajitani
17 - Castor
11-30-2020
02:01 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Hi @mbogusz
Because it was written that the "last year", I filtered by using "consecutive" field.
It is to find out that if there are continuously more men than women at 2020.