Hi,
Good day !
Is there any regex formula to remove second '0' on mobile number ?
Below is the example, I want to remove first '0' after '+30 '
Mobile Number | Output |
+30 0123304011 | +30 123304011 |
+30 146321938 | +30 146321938 |
+30 0440324037 | +30 440324037 |
+30 019663515 | +30 19663515 |
+30 172881533 | +30 172881533 |
+30 178853653 | +30 178853653 |
+30 12343420 | +30 12343420 |
+30 1325750900 | +30 1325750900 |
The desired output is to show '+30' following with 1 space and other numbers ( must start with non-zero ).
Second question, what if there is also some numbers has few 'spaces' after '+30'
For example :
+30 01234069 (contain 2 spaces )
+30 011298799 ( contain 3 spaces )
Thanks !
Solved! Go to Solution.
You could use Text to Columns on space delimiter to give [Output1] and [Output2] columns.
Followed by Formula Tool: IF LEFT([Output1],1) = "0" THEN ""
Then a second formula to concatenate [Output1] & [Output2]: [Output1] + " " + [Output2].
How about this formula?
REGEX_Replace([Mobile Number], "(\+30)\s+0?(.*)", "$1 $2")
Output:
The last row is the case for mutilple spaces.
@fikrizahari
If we dont insist on Reg_Replace😁
Hi @Yoshiro_Fujimori ,
It works like a charm !
However, I would like to understand the meaning of each expressions.
(\+30) : find require string
\s+ : multiple whitespaces
0 : find 'zero'
? : im not sure
(.*) : any following arbitrary string
$1 $2 : im not sure
Please correct me if im wrong above.
Thanks !
I am not an expert of RegEx, so I would recommend check for books or websites for RegEx.
In this particular case, the trick is as follows:
The pattern between () can be called later by $n.
So (\+30) can be called by "$1", and (.*) can be caclled by "$2".
"+" needs to be escaped with "\", as it has a special meaning in RegEx.
"0?" matches with the pattern of 0 or 1 time occurrence of "0".
So the idea is
Find the pattern of
String "+30" followed by one or more spaces, (optionally) followed by "0", and the rest of the string.
And return the above red strings, with one space in between.
I hope this explanation makes some sense.
@Yoshiro_Fujimori
Sound clear to me.
Thanks a lot !
Hi @Qiu and @IanMacLeod,
Both answers also shown similar output.
It's also really helpful without require any regex formula.
Thank you as well !