Bring your best ideas to the AI Use Case Contest! Enter to win 40 hours of expert engineering support and bring your vision to life using the powerful combination of Alteryx + AI. Learn more now, or go straight to the submission form.
Start Free Trial

Weekly Challenges

Solve the challenge, share your solution and summit the ranks of our Community!

Also available in | Français | Português | Español | 日本語
IDEAS WANTED

Want to get involved? We're always looking for ideas and content for Weekly Challenges.

SUBMIT YOUR IDEA

Challenge #486: Prepare for Your Assignment Reviews!

Yoshiro_Fujimori
15 - Aurora
15 - Aurora

My solution.

Did not match the expected output, same as my friends.

Spoiler
Workflow
Challenge+486_workflow.png
Output
ReviewDatePrepDate1PrepDate2
2025-10-032025-10-012025-10-02
2025-10-082025-10-062025-10-07
2025-10-162025-10-142025-10-15
2025-10-172025-10-152025-10-16
2025-10-252025-10-222025-10-23
...  

 

carloslmg
5 - Atom

 

First time doing one of these. I think I got a different approach from other members here.

 

Spoiler
challenge486.png

 

alineruizcampos
8 - Asteroid

I solved this in two different ways:

  1. Ignoring the fact that the reviews take two full working days and allowing multiple assignments to be reviewed per day (as others have done)
  2. Allowing only one assignment to be reviewed per day (using an iterative macro)

For option 2, the first PrepDate I got goes back to May 2024 and therefore we would need a 2024 holiday schedule. Anyway, seems silly to be reviewing an assignment with review date of October 2025 in May 2024 so maybe I misunderstood the question.

 

Spoiler
Screenshot 2025-08-14 145949.pngScreenshot 2025-08-14 150045.png
AkimasaKajitani
17 - Castor
17 - Castor

My solutuion.

 

My approach is to create the calender that has previous working days and then join those data. So, the result is not the same.

 

Spoiler
37cda702-becb-4268-a0bb-4c6f6e6381f7.png

Bobbyt23
13 - Pulsar

@Qiu Just checked out your response to that question and the only difference I can see is when you sort after the output of the first Join. It is Review Date ascending and Row Count ascending, you then sample top 2. I think it needs to sample bottom to if you sort that way, or if you want Top 2 it would need to be Row Count Descending. Really fun challenge though!

Bobbyt23
13 - Pulsar

A nice challenge with lots of fun tools to use.

Spoiler
image.png
Krzysiek
8 - Asteroid

MySolution

RWvanLeeuwen
11 - Bolide

So I interpreted the challenge as follows: Create a schedule that allows you to prepare for the reviews on time. You'll need two days to prepare, and you cannot prepare multiple reviews on the same days. Therefor you must create a schedule that allots two workable preparation days for each planned review.

 

So have a look at what I built:

Spoiler
486.png
RWvanLeeuwen
11 - Bolide

Of note: my solution does not take into account that the preparation dates are before the scheduled review date, but I did not fix this problem because the overall preparation schedule is ONE YEAR BEHIND approximately😆

balajilolla3
7 - Meteor
Spoiler
Solution Attached

Solution Screenshot.png