Challenge #440: Unmask the Saboteur

[Garrett_Stoker]

Spoiler

[RWvanLeeuwen]

here's my take on 440

Spoiler

[KodyKlein]

This was my favorite weekly challenge yet! 

[EuanGriffith]

My last comment didn't tick this off, for some reason.

Spoiler

 

[ScottLewis]

This one was fun but I'm not sure about the conditions. It seemed like I (and some other folks) could only get it down to a small number of suspects logically and then you just have to confront all of those? Or I'm missing something. Either way, nice to shake the rust off.

[BS_THE_ANALYST]

Cool challenge:

Spoiler

 

[Imaizumi]

Here is my solution

Spoiler

[rkakde]

Fun Challenge!

Spoiler

[Desmond]

Looks like the macro was created in a newer version than mine so I could not zip it up in my solution but all the other tools are there if you want to see how I solved.

[GGGDias]

I guess I tend to overthink things, but

(1) shouldn't the name of the suspect also be present in all the events in which a murder had occurred? 

and (2) what says that if a murder wasn't committed the suspect wasn't present?

In other words, if this is also a 'logic' puzzle, it should have been mentioned that the killer ALWAYS kills whenever he/she is present during it's operating hours; ie. if there was not murder, the killer was not present.

Still a nice break from pure analytics and a creative challenge.  

Spoiler