Bring your best ideas to the AI Use Case Contest! Enter to win 40 hours of expert engineering support and bring your vision to life using the powerful combination of Alteryx + AI. Learn more now, or go straight to the submission form.
Start Free Trial

Weekly Challenges

Solve the challenge, share your solution and summit the ranks of our Community!

Also available in | Français | Português | Español | 日本語
IDEAS WANTED

Want to get involved? We're always looking for ideas and content for Weekly Challenges.

SUBMIT YOUR IDEA

Challenge #246: Rectangle Tangle

scoles0617
8 - Asteroid

My solution:

mmontgomery
11 - Bolide
11 - Bolide

Challenge #246

geoff_zath
Alteryx
Alteryx

Macro

geoff_zath_1-1655417704558.png

Workflow

geoff_zath_2-1655417719821.png

 

 

 

FrederikE
13 - Pulsar

Unlike in the solution, I am always taking a rectangle beginning on the left bottom, but the result is what was asked for :)

 

Spoiler
FrederikE_0-1656149556956.pngFrederikE_1-1656149559362.png

 

 

CHarrison
8 - Asteroid

My solution :)

RobertZiegl
8 - Asteroid
Spoiler

2022-07-29 15_34_23-Alteryx Designer x64 - challenge_246_start_file_sol.png

2022-07-29 15_34_42-Alteryx Designer x64 - challenge_246_start_file_macro.png

 Fun challenge. :) "Lost" one point on the 8th iteration (i guess due to rounding issues :)) and then changed from rectangles to triangles

JamesCharnley
13 - Pulsar
Spoiler
JamesCharnley_0-1659430129982.pngJamesCharnley_1-1659430141088.png

Enjoyed this one! Very satisfying

acarter881
12 - Quasar

Here's my solution.

Spoiler
my_weekly_challenge_246_solution.png
RWvanLeeuwen
11 - Bolide

Gottem!

 

workflow

Spoiler
workflow
246 workflow.png

macro
Spoiler
iteratively build up squares and find next midpoints when the area is still not below 5 sqMiiteratively build up squares and find next midpoints when the area is still not below 5 sqMi


acarter881
12 - Quasar

Here's another one of my solutions; this time it matches exactly to the sample solution. I was trying to figure out how to match to the sample solution; if you create a Polygon with the Formula tool using ST_CreatePolygon, the answer is slightly different from the sample solution. Instead, using Poly-Build, I'm able to match exactly to the sample solution. I'm not sure why there's a small difference, but there is.

 

Spoiler
Iterative Macro
acarter881_0-1667687801239.png

Workflow

acarter881_1-1667687874189.png