Hi guys!
I've been using Alteryx for about a year now and have always found good advice on the forums. I'm running across a unique problem here and I haven't been able to find any guidance.
To start with, here is a sample of the data I am working with:
ID | Replaced By | Date |
26750 | 31981 | 6/28/2010 |
27748 | 31981 | 6/28/2010 |
31981 | 31956, 29813 | 5/11/2011 |
29813 | 43797 | 1/14/2016 |
31956 | 43852 | 1/14/2016 |
43797 | 7/1/2019 | |
43852 | 7/1/2019 |
So I am trying to isolate the newest two IDs (last two rows) and create a list of IDs that have preceded each of them. The desired output would be something like this:
ID | GroupID |
26750 | ABC1 |
27748 | ABC1 |
31981 | ABC1 |
29813 | ABC1 |
43797 | ABC1 |
26750 | ABC2 |
27748 | ABC2 |
31981 | ABC2 |
31956 | ABC2 |
43852 | ABC2 |
I feel like I should be doing some sort of macro that looks at the values in the 'Replaced By' column, scans the ID column, finds a match, then pulls the value from the match's Replaced by column, scans the ID column, finds a match, etc... and stops once it finds a match whose replaced by column is null...
Does anyone have any ideas for me, or is there anything I can clarify?
Thanks a lot!
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @Shafeek
This is a perfect case for combining all three type of macros!! I am attaching my workflow that works perfectly for your requirement below.
Main workflow:
Innermost Standard Macro:
Next outer level Iterative Macro:
Next outer level Batch Macro:
Let me know if you have any queries. Thanks.
Hi @Shafeek ,
This is the version with batch and iterative macros .
Batch calls iterative macro for each group .
Iterative macro loops through for all previous ids
Hi @benakesh - This is very close to what we're trying to accomplish and I just have to throw in an extra wrinkle that I did not include in my original post... sorry about that!
So right now your macros are sorting the IDs in an ascending order and then scanning the columns. The logic makes sense, but the output needs to be modified in a small way. For each of IDs we have a 'temp ID' that groups the IDs together in a family of IDs. For example, here is one grouping:
ID | Replaced By | Temp ID | Date |
26750 | 31981 | 9 | 6/28/2010 |
27748 | 31981 | 9 | 6/28/2010 |
31981 | 31956, 29813 | 9 | 5/11/2011 |
29813 | 43797 | 9 | 1/14/2016 |
31956 | 43852 | 9 | 1/14/2016 |
43797 | 9 | 7/1/2019 | |
43852 | 9 | 7/1/2019 |
and another grouping:
ID | Replaced By | Temp ID | Date |
31036 | 27278 | 9734 | 6/28/2010 |
27278 | 29813 | 9734 | 5/11/2011 |
The way this affects your macros is that is scanning across both groups and creating the history while ignoring the Temp ID grouping. So ID 43797 ends up with a list that looks like this:
31036 |
27278 |
29813 |
43797 |
When it should look like this:
ID |
26750 |
27748 |
31981 |
29813 |
43797 |
Again, I'm sorry for having omitted this piece of information. Does my explanation make sense?
@ganesamurthy - I have not tried your macro out yet, but I can imagine it will run into a similar issue since... again... I did not mention this situation in my original post.
I hope my explanation helps clarify the last hurdle. It really is amazing work what you've done and I've given both of your posts likes... if you could modify your workflows to accommodate this Temp ID it would be really helpful!
Thanks!
Hi @benakesh, I tried to plug in the full list that I have and it keeps getting stuck at 69% in the macro - I tried running it for 30 minutes and it never budged. It seems to be endlessly looping.
Any chance you could try it on your end and see if it completes all the way through?
Hi @Shafeek ,
Attached revised versions of main wf and macros . The wf runs for about 50 seconds.
It worked! Thank you so much for your help!
User | Count |
---|---|
17 | |
15 | |
15 | |
8 | |
5 |