Hi,
Is it possible to crosstab without aggregating?
I have an output like this - but its missing all my other rows.
Concat_Name | Result | Bank | Insured Deposits | Right_Insured Deposits | City | Right_Revenue | Revenue | Right_City | Right_Bank |
Bank,City,Insured Deposits,Revenue | Matched | Bank of America | No | No | New York | 45Bn | 45Bn | New York | Bank of America |
expected output - Can this be done?
Concat_Name | Result | Bank | Insured Deposits | Right_Insured Deposits | City | Right_Revenue | Revenue | Right_City | Right_Bank |
Bank,City,Insured Deposits,Revenue | Matched | Bank of America | No | No | New York | 45Bn | 45Bn | New York | Bank of America |
Bank,City,Insured Deposits,Revenue | Matched | Citibank | No | No | New York | 25Bn | 25Bn | New York | Citibank |
Bank,City,Insured Deposits,Revenue | Matched | JPMorgan Chase | No | No | New York | 50Bn | 50Bn | New York | JPMorgan Chase |
Bank,City,Insured Deposits,Revenue | Matched | RBC | Yes | Yes | Toronto | 49Bn | 49Bn | Toronto | RBC |
Bank,City,Insured Deposits,Revenue | Matched | Scotiabank | Yes | Yes | Toronto | 31Bn | 31Bn | Toronto | Scotiabank |
Bank,City,Insured Deposits,Revenue | Matched | TD | Yes | Yes | Toronto | 48Bn | 48Bn | Toronto | TD |
Bank,City,Insured Deposits,Revenue | Matched | Wells Fargo | No | No | New York | 30Bn | 30Bn | New York | Wells Fargo |
Solved! Go to Solution.
@wonka1234 One way of doing this
@binuacs thanks, but some of the data doesnt make sense. Ie a bank has a value for no in the column.
@wonka1234 Updated workflow attached