Hi! My first post here, I have been searching the forums but no other question seems to match my problem
I have 2 tables (I will simplify for the question purposes)
The first one is a set of measurements taken once per second on different vehicles while on the assembly line:
VIN | Measurement_DateTime | Measurement_Value |
AABBCCDDEEFFGG | 2023-07-17 14:19:55 | 4.79788 |
AABBCCDDEEFFGG | 2023-07-17 14:19:56 | 4.89238 |
..... | ..... | .... |
HHIIJJKKLLMMNNOO | 2023-07-19 14:25:45 | 0.408938 |
HHIIJJKKLLMMNNOO | 2023-07-19 14:25:46 | 0.4075 |
.... | .... | .... |
The second table is a set of records of vehicles passing through different assembly line stations, relevant fields below:
VIN | Station_Start_DateTime | Station Name |
AABBCCDDEEFFGG | 2023-07-17 14:19:01 | Station A |
AABBCCDDEEFFGG | 2023-07-17 14:29:35 | Station B |
AABBCCDDEEFFGG | 2023-07-17 14:39:15 | Station C |
HHIIJJKKLLMMNNOO | 2023-07-19 14:16:15 | Station A |
HHIIJJKKLLMMNNOO | 2023-07-19 14:23:36 | Station B |
HHIIJJKKLLMMNNOO | 2023-07-19 14:28:32 | Station C |
Desired Output: For every measurement taken, add a field with the station name where the vehicle was at the DateTime when the measurement was taken. We can assume that each station starts on Station_Start_DateTime and ends just before the next station
VIN | Measurement_DateTime | Measurement_Value | Station_Name |
AABBCCDDEEFFGG | 2023-07-17 14:19:55 | 4.79788 | Station A |
AABBCCDDEEFFGG | 2023-07-17 14:19:56 | 4.89238 | Station A |
..... | ..... | .... | |
HHIIJJKKLLMMNNOO | 2023-07-19 14:25:45 | 0.408938 | Station B |
HHIIJJKKLLMMNNOO | 2023-07-19 14:25:46 | 0.4075 | Station B |
.... | .... | .... |
This is how I am doing it now, but it is extremely inefficient, as the Join block generates GB's of data when combining both tables. My dataset will grow over time, I just measured 2 vehicles and the PC struggles. I need to find a better solution as I need to measure tens of vehicles.
Thank You!
Javier
Solved! Go to Solution.
Forgot to mention that there could be multiple records for each station in the second input table, as each process within the station generates a record. Thanks
Thank you, Christina! It seems to work. Just for my education, I don't understand what the marcro does, is there a way to see the code inside the macro?
While importing you workflow I got a few errors due to my Alteryx version being older than yours, not sure if that has anything to do.
Thanks again,
Javier
Hi @javiroca, if the workflow imported correctly you should be able to right click on the macro to open it (option at the bottom of the menu). But it's a very simple one - just replacing a fixed station value with the calculated formula instead.
As for the versions, I don't think I've used anything specific to the latest versions of Alteryx so hopefully after warning you it will all work correctly!
User | Count |
---|---|
19 | |
15 | |
13 | |
9 | |
8 |