In case you missed the announcement: Alteryx One is here, and so is the Spring Release! Learn more about these new and exciting releases here!

Alteryx Designer Desktop Discussions

Find answers, ask questions, and share expertise about Alteryx Designer Desktop and Intelligence Suite.

Help getting around Cross Tab / 32k field limit

calebhowellks
6 - Meteoroid

Context: I use the Optimization Tool to fully optimize a distribution network. I have successfully done this before. My current issue is that while generating a SLAM matrix, my production workflow creates too many fields (over 32k). 

 

Attached is a simplified workflow. Any ideas on how to generate the correct output without using the Cross Tab tool?

6 REPLIES 6
tonybursey
5 - Atom

I have several YXDBs from 2021.1 that far exceed the 32,000 field limit now imposed by 2023.1 and cannot open them

apathetichell
19 - Altair

@tonybursey - this is a column limit - not a row limit.

tonybursey
5 - Atom

 @apathetichell records are rows... fields are columns. I know the difference

apathetichell
19 - Altair

rereading this - you have 32K fields  in a YXDB -why? Usually I see this in crosstab gone wrong.  you can try to read the discussions on using .yxdb with python which occured a month or so back. I'd a) recommend not using 2023.X b) recommend figuring out a way to get fewer fields in your file.

 

and original post was on 32k in an optimization which is a nightmare and will not work. At that level you should use a special purpose optimization tool on server.

tonybursey
5 - Atom

@apathetichell  i write out datasets to the Allocate data format which cannot handle a multi-dimensional format, the largest of which contains over 2 million rows of geography by almost 51,000 fields and it has to be in a single table per level of geography for my particular use case. I also write out to several other traditional wide table structures but typically those are split up.

apathetichell
19 - Altair

Doesn't sound like my area of expertise - so I'll defer to you that there isn't a way to condense into JSON style semi-structured -or place in a DB designed to handle wide data. So one quick question - why go for 2023.X If you weren't having a problem with the earlier version of Alteryx. I stick with 2021.4 and 2022.1.

Labels
Top Solution Authors