SOLVED
Match value to correct row after Transpose
Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
BonusCup
11 - Bolide
‎11-09-2023
05:54 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Hi,
I have some data coming in with concatenated fields. I've transposed, split to rows, used Tile and cross tabbed to get the 'Current' result below. The issue I'm having is in the 'name_timestamp' field. I'm trying to match that field to the correct row for the same name and email. TIA
ORIGINAL | |||
ID | name | timestamp | |
123 | a1;b2;c3;d4 | a1@email.com;b2@email.com;c3@email.com;d4@email.com | a1-a1@email.com-11/8/2023 11:21 AM;c3-c3@email.com-11/8/2023 1:51 PM |
456 | e1;f2;g3 | e1@email.com;f2@email.com;g3@email.com | g3-g3@email.com-11/7/2021 3:30 PM |
CURRENT:
CURRENT | |||
ID | name | name_timestamp | |
123 | a1@email.com | a1 | a1-a1@email.com-11/8/2023 11:21 AM |
123 | b2@email.com | b2 | c3-c3@email.com-11/8/2023 1:51 PM |
123 | c3@email.com | c3 | |
123 | d4@email.com | d4 | |
456 | e1@email.com | e1 | g3-g3@email.com-11/7/2021 3:30 PM |
456 | f2@email.com | f2 | |
456 | g3@email.com | g3 |
DESIRED:
DESIRED | |||
ID | name | name_timestamp | |
123 | a1@email.com | a1 | a1-a1@email.com-11/8/2023 11:21 AM |
123 | b2@email.com | b2 | |
123 | c3@email.com | c3 | c3-c3@email.com-11/8/2023 1:51 PM |
123 | d4@email.com | d4 | |
456 | e1@email.com | e1 | |
456 | f2@email.com | f2 | |
456 | g3@email.com | g3 | g3-g3@email.com-11/7/2021 3:30 PM |
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
TimN
13 - Pulsar
‎11-09-2023
07:12 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Prometheus
12 - Quasar
‎11-09-2023
07:18 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
@BonusCup There's probably an easier way to do this, but here's my solution.
‎11-09-2023
07:39 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
@Prometheus and @TimN thanks. you both did it the same way. I definitely over thought it. I was trying to split to rows all 3 fields at once. Since it is only 3 fields I can do it this way but if there are a lot more in the future it might get a bit cumbersome.
