Advent of Code is back! Unwrap daily challenges to sharpen your Alteryx skills and earn badges along the way! Learn more now.
community Alteryx IO Mission Control
alteryx Community
Search
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Close
Free Trial

Alteryx Designer Desktop Ideas

Share your Designer Desktop product ideas - we're listening!
Submitting an Idea?

Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!

Submission Guidelines

Featured Ideas

14

Image Recognition Tools

Status: Under Review Submitted 09-08-2021 Submitted by 09-08-2021

Hello,

 

  After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it : 

  > by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,

  > by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)

  > at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?

 

  Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?

 

  In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.

 

  Thank you again

  Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))

 

  Thank you again.

 

  Kévin VANCAPPEL

Read More
Suggest an idea

Update Spatial Field Profiling to Identify Null Values

Status: Accepting Votes Submitted on ‎03-13-2023 09:27 AM Submitted by on ‎03-13-2023 09:27 AM
1 Comment (1 New)

Alteryx currently shows 100% in the profiling of spatial fields in the results window, regardless of if there are rows with missing spatial features. I opened a ticket about this & was told it is expected behavior.

 

Therefore, I submit the idea that the profiling for spatial fields should give an accurate profile of the field, & if there are nulls in the field, it should identify that column isn't 100% OK and show the % of records that have null values, like the profiling does for every other column in workflows.

1.JPG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thank you!

See more ideas labeled with:
0 Likes

Add Mosaic name translation to ConsumerView Decoder Tool

Status: Accepting Votes Submitted on ‎04-13-2021 04:30 PM Submitted by on ‎04-13-2021 04:30 PM
2 Comments (2 New)

I love the new (relatively) ConsumerView Decoder Tool! I used to do it the hard way, and it was fragile.

 

However, one thing is still missing: the Mosaic fields (MOSAIC HOUSEHOLD and MOSAIC ZIP4) - these are output from the tool as nulls. So, not only do you not get it decoded, you have to join back to the input to get the fields back as they were.

 

First, at least please pass them through as they were.

 

But preferably, decode them to the Mosaic Segment/Group names.

 

I realize (or couldn't find) the source for the Mosaic segment definitions is not currently in a Calgary database, but the tool is in the Calgary group.

See more ideas labeled with:
Labels
Top Liked Authors
View All