Alteryx Designer Desktop Discussions

Find answers, ask questions, and share expertise about Alteryx Designer Desktop and Intelligence Suite.
SOLVED

How can I select the item based on the group threshold?

calvinwong
7 - Meteor

Hi,

 

I have the following data. I'm trying to select the number based on a group threshold of 80. So I basically have to select the highest number within the group to make the group total to be under the group threshold of 80. Is there a way to do that with the formula tool? or other tools?

 

Group NumberSelectNot SelectEach Group's Total (currently)
A10  150
A30  
A40  
A50  
A20  
B90  135
B10  
B15  
B20  
C40  210
C50  
C20  
C100  

 

Thanks for your help!! Much appreciated.

10 REPLIES 10
asilva
7 - Meteor
 
tcroberts
12 - Quasar

I'm working on a sample workflow to solve this right now, but I just want to clarify:

 

You're looking to have each group be under some group threshold (in your case, 80). To do so, you want to remove the highest number from each group if necessary.

 

Is my understanding correct? What happens if removing a single number does not get the group below 80 (as is the case with Group A), would you then remove the second largest number?

 

Cheers!

calvinwong
7 - Meteor

Thank you so much. I want to basically put a "Yes" on the highest number (not necessary removing it) under the Select column if the group total is over the threshold. And yes. In Group A's case, then I will need to put a Yes on both 50 and 40 under the select column. Hopefully that make sense.

tcroberts
12 - Quasar

Sorry for taking so long. I've got a couple of solutions for you.

 

 

If the order that the records are in currently isnt important, than you could sort by Group, then by Number (ascending), and use the a RunningTotal Tool, followed by a Formula Tool with the following expression

 

IF [RunTot_Number] - [Number] >= 80
THEN "YES"
ELSE "NO"
ENDIF

 

Spoiler
flag_group_thresh_1_ex.PNG

Ive attched a Numeric UpDown Input so that you could change the threshold dynamically, but hard-coding it would work just as well.

 

If the order of the records is important, you could add a RecordID Tool first, and then sort by the RecordID afterwards.

 

 

Let me know if this solution works for you. I have a slightly more complicated iterative macro-based version, but I think this one should suffice.

 

 

Cheers!

calvinwong
7 - Meteor

Thank you tcroberts. This works. But my last question is, I feel like the analytic app doesn't work for some reason after I update the number to 110. Let me know what your thoughts are.

tcroberts
12 - Quasar
Hmm... it doesn't work at all, or it gives the wrong answer?

I'll have to take a closer look tomorrow morning, but it could be because I misconfigured the update tool. Check that its replacing a specific string, that string being: 80

If not I'll let you know when i've had a chance to dig into it
calvinwong
7 - Meteor

When I run the analytic app and change it to 110. It basically gives me the same answer as the 80 one. Thanks for all the help. You have been really helpful. :)

tcroberts
12 - Quasar
Yea that sounds like I configured the input incorrectly. I'll upload a fixed version for you tomorrow morning
tcroberts
12 - Quasar

Hi @calvinwong,

 

It was indeed the configuration of the update tool. I've changed it to replace a specific string: 80, so what will happen is whenever the input value changes, this 80 in the base expression is replaced with the value from the input. It should work now for values in the range of 0-250, otherwise you'll have to update the "Maximum" configuration in the Numeric UpDown Tool.


Cheers!

Labels