Weekly Challenges

Solve the challenge, share your solution and summit the ranks of our Community!

Also available in | Français | Português | Español | 日本語
IDEAS WANTED

Want to get involved? We're always looking for ideas and content for Weekly Challenges.

SUBMIT YOUR IDEA

Challenge #409: Catch or Drop? Predicting Business Outcomes with Randomness

Reesetrain2
9 - Comet

All,

 

So, my workflow has Deebo Samuel with an 80% catch rate versus his true 67% catch rate.

 

I used a standalone workflow with a round for a grouping tool and then no Macro Input, I have never really used this setup before but if you need to run the same workflow with multiple iterations due to a randomness incorporated, I think that this is definitely the way to go!

-Please let me know your thoughts!

 

Screenshot 2024-01-26 170347.png

 

 

Spoiler
 

 

Screenshot 2024-01-26 164810.png

Screenshot 2024-01-26 170531.png


 

nSpire
9 - Comet
Spoiler
image upload failed
RashedDS
8 - Asteroid

409.JPG

raeaton
8 - Asteroid

My solution:

 

Spoiler
Challenge_409_Solution_Re.PNG

Ray_Pospisil
8 - Asteroid

Python pandas, Databricks.Pyspark, SQL and Alteryx solution

gerda
8 - Asteroid
Spoiler
Screenshot 2024-02-23 165847.png

This one was hard!

DaisukeTsuchiya
13 - Pulsar
Spoiler
スクリーンショット 2024-03-06 153654.png
cusher
8 - Asteroid
Spoiler
 
ScottLewis
9 - Comet

Could have been an interesting challenge if the tasks had been well defined. As it is there is no model for how to apply the multiplier or what most of the player input data means so there isn't really any meaning to be extracted. Also I'm not sure why the easy part (random 3d6) was called out as hard and the hard part (building a statistical model of real world events) was assumed to be trivial. I suppose there's a lesson there but it is in requirements design, not so much Alteryx.