Search

Close

Weekly Challenges

Solve the challenge, share your solution and summit the ranks of our Community!

Also available in | Français | Português | Español | 日本語

IDEAS WANTED

Want to get involved? We're always looking for ideas and content for Weekly Challenges.

SUBMIT YOUR IDEA

my solution ;-)

This was a complex one but I managed to do it 🎉

Final flow:

Screenshot 2023-05-02 130432.png

Screenshot 2023-05-02 130432.png

Screenshot 2023-05-02 130101.png

This was a fun one, especially after getting into F1 recently from watching Drive to Survive and wondering why they traveled in such a random order.

Workflow - extra distance tools in there so to see it in miles

Macro - Not sure that's the typical way to do the iterative but I got it to work.

Workflow - extra distance tools in there so to see it in milesMacro - Not sure that's the typical way to do the iterative but I got it to work.

My solution (however slighty different from the solution for part 2)

Workflow:

Macro:

Great challenge this week, see spoiler for some thoughts

Do see some differences in the answers on the forum. I seem to get 56406 KM as the shortest distance, utilising the distance tool ,sort and concatenating a field to check it can't go back to a track it has been at.

Do see some differences in the answers on the forum. I seem to get 56406 KM as the shortest distance, utilising the distance tool ,sort and concatenating a field to check it can't go back to a track it has been at.

First Iterative Macro, took a minute, but slowly getting more comfortable with iterative macros.

My solution. Stuck with the Find Nearest to get the matching answer. I wish I had the time to play with this some more. It's a fun exercise, but always going to the next nearest location is often not the most efficient way to optimize a route.

This is quite similar with #266.

First time working with macros and not that long into spatial analysis. This challenge was challenging and fun:)

Works, but is could be simplezied.