Bring your best ideas to the AI Use Case Contest! Enter to win 40 hours of expert engineering support and bring your vision to life using the powerful combination of Alteryx + AI. Learn more now, or go straight to the submission form.
Start Free Trial

Weekly Challenges

Solve the challenge, share your solution and summit the ranks of our Community!

Also available in | Français | Português | Español | 日本語
IDEAS WANTED

Want to get involved? We're always looking for ideas and content for Weekly Challenges.

SUBMIT YOUR IDEA

Challenge #30: Alteryx '16 Grand Prix (Race 1, L2)

s_wright
8 - Asteroid

Solved challenge_30 attached. Did not finish this in under 10 minutes.

SteveY02
8 - Asteroid

Done

pedcar
8 - Asteroid

solution

JBevan89
8 - Asteroid

My Solution attached.  The Pearson tool is very straight forward then, as you just select a couple of items from the list to find the correlation

kailai1025
7 - Meteor
Spoiler
clanllenge_30_solution_KL.png

Here's my solution..

RebekaMazuchova
8 - Asteroid

:)

barrymoe
8 - Asteroid

In terms of understanding pearson correlation, why wouldn't we want to do the same group by and average the hitter rank per team? My thought is this would normalize teams who may have picked a disproportionate number of hitters/pitchers.  

Daniel_Homola
8 - Asteroid

here!

PuffinPanic
10 - Fireball
10 - Fireball

Solution

Don't panic - I've got Alteryx!
ehendershot
7 - Meteor
Spoiler
ehendershot_0-1751902819299.png