We've recently made an accessibility improvement to the community and therefore posts without any content are no longer allowed. Please use the spoiler feature or add a short message in the message body in order to submit your weekly challenge.
Weekly Challenge
Solve the challenge, share your solution and summit the ranks of our Community!Also available in | Français | Português | Español | 日本語
IDEAS WANTED
We're actively looking for ideas on how to improve Weekly Challenges and would love to hear what you think!
Submit Feedback
Spoiler
The answer would differ based on when you apply the "current year" filter. If you take the latest year for a country where the number of males is greater than that of females and then apply the current year filter, you would get the result as shown in the original post.
But if the sequence of filters is altered, we would get the result as explained by @Blake. As we are supposed to take the latest year( in past ), we should apply the current year filter before applying the other filter (number of male > number of female).
But if the sequence of filters is altered, we would get the result as explained by @Blake. As we are supposed to take the latest year( in past ), we should apply the current year filter before applying the other filter (number of male > number of female).
A.Current Year Filter after getting the latest year where num of male > num of female:
1.
2.
3.
B. If current year filter is applied before getting the latest year where num of male > num of female
Way to land Answer1 @AkimasaKajitani with the 'Consecutive' column as a filter. I'm still not sure what that's trying to show, but you got it.
Here is my solution with the alternative to Answer1
Spoiler
#243 in the can
#243 in the can
Hi @mbogusz
Because it was written that the "last year", I filtered by using "consecutive" field.
It is to find out that if there are continuously more men than women at 2020.
