This site uses different types of cookies, including analytics and functional cookies (its own and from other sites). To change your cookie settings or find out more, click here. If you continue browsing our website, you accept these cookies.
We're actively looking for ideas on how to improve Weekly Challenges and would love to hear what you think!
Submit FeedbackI didn't like the idea of around 19% of records dropping due to not having corresponding coordinates, hence I employed a quick Macro to get the missing co-ordinates.
And here's how the results differ:
Without the Macro (356 records dropping off) and then with them included. There is no difference in the most common table. So is it even needed to include the others?
I have yet to study spatial and reporting tools, but still managed to create a haphazard solution 😂
Next time will revisit again after learning these tools... 👨🎓
My noobie solution:
This was a good reporting and spatial challenge! I had to modify to concatenate city,state before summarizing - I got different totals otherwise. Turns out there's a Phoenix, OR and Las Vegas,NM. Who knew?
My solution!
Cheers!
NJ