Challenge #230: Take a Look, It's in a Book!

[dsmdavid]

Spent the most time getting the reporting just right -- why header and footer are not showing in png, html, pptx but are in pdf?

Spoiler

[CKent]

Enjoyed playing w/ the Reporting Tools!

[naresh5315]

My solution: Workflow

Spoiler

My solution: Chart

Spoiler

[coracai]

Another one down. 

[hamza_khan]

Considering that I am not a book worm, I made my workflow look like one.

[PriyankaaJ]

As my colleague pointed it out, records with multiple authors are separated by an "and" and a "with". So there is a slight difference in the total number of weeks and the total count of books.

Spoiler

[RichoBsJ]

Hi! Nice challenge! Here my solution 🙂

By the way, the provided solution is inaccurate; for example, James Patterson should sum 200 weeks instead of 195, because the provided solution hasn't taken into account the 5 weeks of the books that have a "with" word in the "author" field...

Spoiler

Graph:



Table:

[balajilolla]

Spoiler

Solution Attached

[dlopez13]

Doesn't look like the recommended output accounted for this, but I applied fuzzy matching to the split author names to account for inconsistent formatting.  It did result in a small increase to the data that made it into the chart.  

Spoiler

[mbogusz]

Spoiler