The Inspire Cyber Monday promo has been extended to Dec. 1! This offer is discounted off the Early Bird price and includes 20% off for conference-only passes and 10% off training passes.
alteryx Community

# Weekly Challenge

Solve the challenge, share your solution and summit the ranks of our Community!

Also available in | Français | Português | Español | 日本語
###### IDEAS WANTED

Want to get involved? We're always looking for ideas and content for Weekly Challenges.

## Challenge #203: Everyone loves a toll booth

9 - Comet

Pretty much in line with the provided solution.

12 - Quasar
Spoiler

17 - Castor

Got a slightly different answer than the provided solution - but very close (presumably a rounding difference):

Spoiler

8 - Asteroid

So a couple things fall out of this. You have to decide whether to translate to minutes before of after you add up. Not a big deal, I made the opposite choice from the solution.

Far more interesting is that the datediff() function has two properties I had not really thought about:

1. The difference is returned in the specified units as an integer. This makes some sense, but it also means the fractional minutes are lost.
2. Even weirder, it seems to always do a floor rather than round. So 59 seconds is deemed 0 minutes, 93 seconds is 1 minute, etc... Which explains why my seconds-based computation comes out higher

The experiment with datediff() is included in the attached WF  and image inside the spoiler.

Spoiler

8 - Asteroid

Solution attached

8 - Asteroid

ow im somewhat attuned to multirow formula haha no need to use join tool tho

12 - Quasar

my solution

11 - Bolide

Spoiler

Matches output!

11 - Bolide

I'll echo what others said about the time not matching.

Spoiler
8 - Asteroid

Really enjoyed that one! I'm off by a minute, but looks like I'm not the only one...

Spoiler