We've recently made an accessibility improvement to the community and therefore posts without any content are no longer allowed. Please use the spoiler feature or add a short message in the message body in order to submit your weekly challenge.
alteryx Community

# Weekly Challenge

Solve the challenge, share your solution and summit the ranks of our Community!

Also available in | Français | Português | Español | 日本語
###### IDEAS WANTED

We're actively looking for ideas on how to improve Weekly Challenges and would love to hear what you think!

Submit Feedback

## Challenge #144: Secret Santa Assignments (BAH HUMBUG!)

13 - Pulsar

Here's my solution with iterative macros to solve both the easy and the net scrooginess =< 13

Spoiler
WorkflowIterative macro for any pairIterative macro to cap net Scroogieness to 13
Chris
Check out my collaboration with fellow ACE Joshua Burkhow at AlterTricks.com
13 - Pulsar

[Duplicate post]

Chris
Check out my collaboration with fellow ACE Joshua Burkhow at AlterTricks.com
8 - Asteroid

Took a simple route. Not sure if I got the right answer, But, am confident that I took logical and straightforward steps!

*// EDIT: I completed this challenge for all possible combinations!!!!

Spoiler

5 - Atom

Here my first 'weekly challenge' solution contribution, not short as in 5 tools (I have 3 extras for sorting and to calculate the net), but hey, this is my first contribution and it is exactly sorted the way it was sorted in the output request and works for any given number of names/records (not only 50). Wish all a happy 'advents' time.

8 - Asteroid

My Solution:

Spoiler
8 - Asteroid

Fun one :-)

Alteryx

I went down a route that I wasn't 100% sure would work due to the logic being very simple.....

Spoiler
Basically matched the highest with the lowest, and hoped the middle would sort itself out, thankfully it did.

8 - Asteroid

Here is my solution. Nice and simple and works for scroogieness as well.

Spoiler
8 - Asteroid

Here is my solution... same results!

18 - Pollux

I had to throw this one in since nowhere did @JoeM say that the basic pairings had to be random!  3 tools!

Spoiler

A more robust solution is on the way

Dan