Community Spring Cleaning week is here! Join your fellow Maveryx in digging through your old posts and marking comments on them as solved. Learn more here!
The Product Idea boards have gotten an update to better integrate them within our Product team's idea cycle! However this update does have a few unique behaviors, if you have any questions about them check out our FAQ.

Alteryx Server Ideas

Share your Server product ideas - we're listening!
Submitting an Idea?

Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!

Submission Guidelines

Notification hierarchy in Gallery

Would like to see a Notification hierarchy implemented to Gallery. Currently, the settings that control notifications are at the Gallery-level....where only the admin can control, for example, notifying users if a new workflow was added to a collection they belong too. Could this setting be inherited, but then, for example, a Collection owner can implement their own notification settings that overrides the Gallery default? Using the same example as before, perhaps the Collection owner could disable notifying their Users if a new workflow is loaded to the collection.

 

Nick

5 Comments
Community_Admin
Alteryx
Alteryx
Status changed to: Inactive
 
Community_Admin
Alteryx
Alteryx

The status of this idea has been changed to 'Inactive'. This status indicates that:

 

1. The idea has not had activity in the form of likes or comments in over a year.

2. The idea has not reached ten likes.

3. The idea is still in the 'New Idea' status. 

 

However, this doesn't mean your idea won't be implemented! The Community can still like and comment on this idea. With enough renewed interest, this idea can be brought back into the 'New Idea' status. 

 

Thank you for contributing to the Alteryx Community and the Alteryx Product Idea Boards!

SeanAdams
17 - Castor
17 - Castor

So @Nick612Haylund  - you are thinking of a model where collection owners have control of permissions and notifications for their collections without giving them admin rights to the entire server?

 

If so - that does make a lot of sense.   On a big implementation you do need a much finer degree of control of assets so that the central admin team does not become a bottleneck.

Nick612Haylund
10 - Fireball
10 - Fireball

Precisely that model @SeanAdams! 🙂

SeanAdams
17 - Castor
17 - Castor

You have my vote @Nick612Haylund - there's a need for the server admin to be able to be delegated out to asset owners in a controlled way (without making the asset owner a server-admin in their own right) - otherwise the server administration role becomes a choke-point and very resource-intensive.