Append data to Tableau server

[Watsa]

I have used Publish to Tableau Server macro for over a years.  It works fine when I want to overwrite the data. 

However, the current macros (from Alteryx Gallery and Invisio) won't work with appending the data. Please modify or develop a workable macro for 'Append the data to Tableau Server'. It will save a lot of time in the daily update process.  

Note: I am using Alteryx 11 and Tableau 10.1. Thank you very much.

[andrewdatakim]

Update to the newest version of the Publish to Tableau Server and it has the Append option. They just added it recently! https://gallery.alteryx.com/#!app/Publish-to-Tableau-Server--Installer-/58f7e758a18e9e18fcad65a7 . *Be careful uploading large .tdes I have ran into an an error where they are producing 1 MB files. You can overcome this by reverting back to an older version of Alteryx just for these workflows while the engineering team works on a solution.

[Watsa]

Thank you very much. I will try to download this version. I don't think I can revert back to the older version. Unless I have to recreate everything in the older version, correct?

[apolly]

Hi!

Here is an updated link to the Publish to Tableau Server macro:

https://gallery.alteryx.com/#!app/Publish-to-Tableau-Server--Installer-/5926021ceffc2a0b7cc2bc44

Please reach out with feedback

[Community_Admin]

The status of this idea has been changed to 'Inactive'. This status indicates that:

1. The idea has not had activity in the form of likes or comments in over a year.

2. The idea has not reached ten likes.

3. The idea is still in the 'New Idea' status. 

However, this doesn't mean your idea won't be implemented! The Community can still like and comment on this idea. With enough renewed interest, this idea can be brought back into the 'New Idea' status. 

Thank you for contributing to the Alteryx Community and the Alteryx Product Idea Boards!

[Joe_Lipski]

@KylieF As per the comments, I think this can be marked as implemented 🙂

[KylieF]

Thank you for the ping @Joe_Lipski ! You're completely correct, and I've updated this idea to Implemented to reflect the changes mentioned above.