Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
On Right Clicking to "Comment" we should be able to convert it to "Tool Container" or "Tool Container" to "Comment". Also, it should map all the common configurations or similar. The mapping can be as such:
This example is from Comment to Tool Container,
Text --> Caption upto length 200 or so,..
Shape --> NA
Font --> NA
Text Color --> Text Color
Background Color --> Fill Color and Border Color
Text Alignment --> NA
Background Image --> NA
Transparency and Margin to Default
It would be great to have the option to FILTER on the columns within the TEXT INPUT TOOL.
Example, in the screenshot below I would like to filter this on the FirmCode Alphabetically
There is MD5 hashing capability,using MD5_ASCII(String) and MD5_UNICODE(String) found under string functions
it seems to be possible to encrypt/mask sensitive data...
BUT! using the following site it's child's play to decrypt MD5 --> https://hashkiller.co.uk/md5-decrypter.aspx
I entered password and encrypt it with MD5 giving me 5f4dcc3b5aa765d61d8327deb882cf99
Site gave me decrypted result in 131 m/s...
It may be wise to have;
SHA512_ASCII(String) and
SHA512_UNICODE(String)
Best
Altan Atabarut @Atabarezz
I've found that double-clicking in the expression builder results in varying behavior (possibly due to field names with spaces?)
It would be great if double-clicking a field selected everything from bracket to bracket inclusive, making it simpler to replace one field with another.
For instance:
Current:
IF [AVG AGE] >=5 THEN "Y" ELSE "N" ENDIF
Desired:
IF [AVG AGE] >=5 THEN "Y" ELSE "N" ENDIF
Hi Alteryx Community and Developers!
Since the autodetect smtp was removed from Alteryx Designer, it's much more harder to send e-mails within the company (too many different e-mail addresses).
In place of autodetect, what do you think about to take the SMTP from field (like cc, bcc, subject, etc.)?
Please keep me posted about it 🙂
Thanks and all the best for the Community!
Kucsi
It would be great if Alteryx could introduce a tool implementing a Decision Model Notation (DMN)-style Decision Table as an option to remove business logic from a workflow.
Arbitrary business rules are frequently implemented against datasets in Alteryx workflows before actual processing occurs. The implementation of complex business logic frequently results in a spider web of join, filter, formula, and union tools.
It would be awesome if we could edit annotations while the workflow is running.
I love annotating all my tools, and I'm often sitting there looking at my canvas right after hitting run and thinking, "I should annotate that!" and then moving on and forgetting after it's run. I'm not sure if that's feasible or not, but I think it would be neat.
It would be helpful to redirect Help Documentation searches to the latest version number. When Googling problems I often get help page links that are for version 9.5 while I'm on version 11.7. I'll usually change the version number in the URL to get to the right documentation. It would be great if the version <11 documentation would automatically port forward to the current documentation with the option to go to older documentation for users on those versions.
Geohash is a latitude/longitude geocode system (public domain). It is a hierarchical spatial data structure which subdivides space into buckets of grid shape.
Geohashes offer properties like arbitrary precision and the possibility of gradually removing characters from the end of the code to reduce its size (and gradually lose precision).
As a consequence of the gradual precision degradation, nearby places will often (but not always) present similar prefixes. The longer a shared prefix is, the closer the two places are.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geohash
https://github.com/sharonjl/geohash-net
https://github.com/simplegeo/libgeohash/blob/master/geohash.c
Could you please assess the idea of reverse engineering existing SQL code (in special inside DataWarehouse's code, thousands of LOCs filled with SELECT and JOINS) and replace it with Alteryx widgets?
Doing this will accelerate penetration rate of Alteryx products in large companies and dismantle IBM Cognos and their cousins.
Currently with Alias Manager you can only create Aliases for database connections.
We use HDFS Connections to write files to HDFS so it would be really useful to use an Alias especially when promoting workflows to Alteryx Server.
When attempting to save from Designer to Gallery the last step of the save is the validation step. The validation step, as I understand it, checks to make sure there's a valid license on Gallery. This counts as one of the processing "threads". If your organization is constrained by the throughput on Gallery, this can cause delays.
Our business only has the 2-thread service level for Alteryx Gallery. Consequently, if someone is running long, drawn out workflows on Gallery, this can create delays in saving the file from Designer to Gallery. It can also cause delays if there's a long "line" of workflows waiting to run. I presume that the save attempt is put in line along with the other jobs on Gallery that have to run. If this is the case, it could take a long time to complete the validation--tens of minutes or longer.
That window being open keeps the user from being able to use Designer at all. Very inefficient. There should be a requirement that the user has both valid licenses on Designer and on Gallery before they can run anything on Gallery. However, the validation of both of those is already accomplished by virtue of the fact that Designer checks for a license whenever the program loads. Also, if Gallery checks for the license anytime the workflow runs, then the second half of this check is already accomplished and, therefore, renders the check when saving to Gallery unnecessary. Please correct me if i'm wrong on this.
Change #1) Please the validation of Gallery license when saving from Designer to Gallery.
Change #2) Please adjust Designer such that you can continue to edit workflows on the same session while other files are being saved to Gallery.
Change #3) If we can't get #1 or #2, please change the queueing process to put attempts to save to Gallery in the front of the line because they should take <1 second to validate the license while other workflows could take many minutes.
Olá, não sei se classifiquei a ideia na caixa correta, mas eu gostaria de ver uma ferramenta, provavelmente na aba "Transformar", e que traria o subtotal e total de um conjunto de linhas, sem ter que construir um fluxo somente para isso. Acredito que com uma ferramenta, apenas, o problema possa ser resolvido, como no exemplo anexo, o que é bem fácil de fazer no Excel, por exemplo.
In my environment, installing Core Data Bundle to network drive ("prepare a network install") runs for hours or days due to network factors. If interrupted, I need to start from scratch again.
These changes would greatly improve the installation:
Request: Currently Alteryx does not support a connector to SharePoint lists if those lists are on SP sites with claims-based authentication. Please add in this functionality so data can be imported directly into a workflow.
Rationale: Claims-based authentication can be used in situations where two workgroups (or companies) want to collaborate on information housed in a SharePoint list. The claims-based authentication allows for both "internal" and "external" consumers of the information to access the SharePoint site, perhaps with different permission levels.
However, if information is placed in a claims-based authenticated site, it cannot be accessed directly in Alteryx. Using the data in workflows becomes extremely difficult without cumbersome workarounds. The power and flexibility of Alteryx workflow scheduling, analysis, reporting, and notifications should be extended to cover data in all SharePoint sites.
Sample Use Case: I maintain a SharePoint site / list for vendors to report in on the status of projects we have assigned them. The site uses claims-based authentication to enable the vendors, who are not employees of our company, to access and update the list.
SharePoint's built-in workflows are adequate for notification and updating when a new item is added, or an item changes. However, I often want to obtain and send out snapshots of the data as they stand: how many items are open, how many have recently been closed within SLA, etc. This cannot be done within the SharePoint platform without extremely convoluted means and potentially tying up resources on the SharePoint server.
Alteryx has the perfect tools for easily performing this analysis and sending notifications to stakeholders -- and when using the Gallery scheduler, it can do so on an automated basis. However, without direct import into Alteryx from SharePoint, I need to have scheduled exports to an intermediary Excel file. Said intermediate export has issues with authentication, which would be resolved with a SharePoint connector that authenticates with saved credentials every time.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
41 | |
31 | |
20 | |
10 | |
7 |