Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
When dealing with huge workflows, I find myself often needing to use a select tool with comment above as a simple placeholder to come back to that data set as it helps me keep track of everything. It would be nice if there was a tool that didn't really have a function in itself besides allowing one to reference back to that spot.
I understand one could use a browse tool to achieve the same result but the reason I like using the select tool is because it's a lot easier to work off the dataset with an output arrow whereas with a browse tool I would have to find the previous spot I had the data and delete the browse tool that I was using as a placeholder.
In python, there is this monthrange function which is very useful to find out the days in particular month and also particular year (leap year)
In python we will only have to do this to get monthrange
x[i] = calendar.monthrange(Year_S, Month_S)[1]
whereas in Alteryx, we will have to do this
datetimeday(DateTimeTrim(DateTimeParse([START_DATE],'%Y-%m-%d'),'lastofmonth'))
The different are enormous and I can see that Alteryx team was able to add in this in a jiffy.
I was hoping we can simplify the code so that users wont have to go and dig around to find a way to get thru.
This will be helpful in doing calculations like insurance/interest premium, where we need to find the remaining days of in the month.
I saw this article (Oculus App Makes Programming Tangible To Non-Coders) and immediately thought of Alteryx.
How about a virtual reality based version where the user can be in the canvas and reach out and touch their data directly?
Maybe I am a newbie, but it is really galling that the drop down tool in the interface palette wont show the values in a connected tool unless they are spun up as headers in a cross tab using a record ID ruse. Alteryx really needs to provide this very common use case. This functionality is so easy to implement and is a fundamental part of any UI. Take a field and show its values as a drop down. Please tell me I am missing something and that this is really easy. I know we can save it as a name value pair in a yxdb and then input that, but I should not have to do so many things for what is an essential function.
At first I was going to suggest a new tool, but I think this works better as a configuration item. Some users, myself included, develop workflows with several containers intended to allow portions of the workflow to be turned on and off for the purpose of debug, more efficient development, etc. Managing which containers are enabled and disabled can become cumbersome and time-consuming.
I propose a new tab in the Workflow Configuration to allow the user to easily enable/disable containers. The Container configuration tab would list all containers by their tool number and caption. Each container would also have a state slider (Enabled/Disabled) that would show the current state of the container. The user could click any container's state slider to enable/disable as desired. An "all" slider that enabled/disabled all containers would also be helpful.
This enhancement would centralize container management and save developers a lot of time.
Thanks for your consideration.
I was discussing these suggestions with our Account Manager last year and was advised that they would be taken into consideration for the planned 2018 Reporting upgrades. When I inquired about the status, I was advised to post here.
It would be nice if we could use our gallery with a mobile app. We like to run demographics on site and have to pull up on the ipad.
Also, if instead of typing in an address, we could use the iphones "current location" option.
There is a lot of usage of calendar events in business world. Having a native sync and input functions for popular calendar formats like ical or google calendars will save a lot of time
When users execute a sql statement via an input tool, the tool should be smart enough to invoke the (nolock) hint to avoid any database locking when querying a SQL database. Most users aren't advanced enough to understand how to do this in the SQL statement. It should be done automatically or at the very least, a check box option for user.
The issue : we have to regurlary change our passwords. It implies changing it for all the connections alias (at least for standard connections).
What I'm looking for :
A commande line to execute like :
alteryxpw.exe -connection {alias name} -connection_type {user/system} -connection_mode {standard/indb} -pw {new password}
This command line could be executed by a powerhsell script.
Sometimes on the "Join Tool" Interface in the Config screen.
You can not scroll down to read last item. The scroll bar is not at the bottom nor can be scrolled further down.
Would be great to have a find and replace option in the workflow. I've deployed a template workflow to maintain a datamart. I have about 50 sources which means about 50 workflows all very similar to each other. In fact its typically only table names that change. Would be cool to be able to open the template workflow and just do a find and replace on the name of the table. The find and replace could prompt me on each replace or I could do a replace all. This would be consistent with other apps like Excel.
There has been the idea of running tools in a workflow in parrallel...
It's a tough job becuse there are a lot of complex dependencies I get that...
but how about a lazy parallelization so that
until the independent parts of a workflow merge, with a join or a union or an append,
these clusters can be run in parallel I believe...
It would be great to be able to display a table to the "Insights" section of the gallery - ideally one that can have formatting (eg row rules and column rules as per basic table tool)
Please create a way to swap or change the order of the inputs and outputs for tools with two or more inputs and outputs.
For example: When creating a workflow a join tool can end up moving to a location on the canvas that causes flow paths to cross. To fix the overlapping paths with a simple option of change order of input and output with a simple up and down would be much better than deleting the paths and reconnecting and redefining all of the join fields.
We all love the Directory tool as it allows us to read in a list of files in a given folder location and sub-folder location, but wouldn't it be nice if we could use the tool to connect to a database and read in a list of table names? This would allow us to easily build batch macros to allow us to loop through all tables within a datasource as we can with flat files.
This would be a great help in data migration, as I could then build a single tool where I could just input the connection string to the source from which I am extracting and the destination connection and migrate the data automatically.
Would be nice.
M.
Connecting tools that are far apart in a big workflow is challenging.
My suggestion:
When you right click on the tool you want to connect FROM one of the menu choices would be "Connect From" which you would select. If the tool has multiple outputs (like a join for example) there would be a sub-menu with list of outputs.)
Then you would navigate to the tool you want to connect to (I use the overview window all the time) and right click on the tool you want to connect TO and there would be a menu choice "Connect To". Again - if there are multiple inputs then there would be a sub-menu.
I'd expect Alteryx to remember the tool you connected from, so if you wanted to connect to multiple tools (say from an input file) you could just go to the next tool and right click and "Connect To" would be available.
Cheers,
Bob
Make it easier to use Delete and connect around
ex: Shift + Delete
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
91 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 |