This site uses different types of cookies, including analytics and functional cookies (its own and from other sites). To change your cookie settings or find out more, click here. If you continue browsing our website, you accept these cookies.
We now have the ability to output to an ESRI File Geodatabase, which is great, but it only allows you to output it to the WGS84 coordinate system. I would like to have the same functionality to export it to other projections or coordinate systems similar to the ESRI Shapefile or ESRI Personal Geodatabase output tools (we specifically need NAD83 but I'm sure others would like other options as well).
Alteryx started as a geospatial application. The "y" and "x" in Alteryx stand for the geospatial origin of the application. So why doesn't every tool in the Spatial Category have a One Tool Example? As of version 2019.2.7, there is only one One Tool Example in the Spatial Category. It is for the Distance Tool.
Please make One Tool Examples for every Spatial tool. Thank you.
I would like the ability to take custom geographies and write them to a table in Exasol. We visualize our data with Tableau and rely on live connections to Exasol tables rather than Tableau extracts. One shortcoming with spatial is that we have to output our custom geographies as a .shp file then make a Tableau Extract. This would save us a few steps in sharing this data with our users.
it would be nice Street Geocoding tool can be capable of accepting Latitude and Longitude and spit out the address like Reverse Geo Coding . The reverse Geo coding currently using TomTom is too slow to process hundred thousands records.. if the data is already local to our system in form of CASS or Street Geocoder that will be certainly faster.
A lot of popular machine learning systems use a computer's GPU to speed up some of the math to a huge degree. The header on this article on Medium shows a 15x difference from a high-end CPU vs a high-end GPU. It could also create an improvement in the spatial tools. Perhaps Alteryx should add this functionality in order to speed up these tools, which I can imagine are currently some of the slowest.
I would like to specify two points on a map and have Alteryx create a spatial object that represents the best route from one point to another given some parameters such as quickest route, or shortest route.
Recently we had a situation where installing the data packages was expected to take over 20 hours! We do not have the ability to run a machine undisturbed for this length of time at the office, and VPN automatically times out after 12 hours. Okay, so these items are company-specific, but how nice would it be to be able to download/install the data in smaller portions so you don't have to worry about setting up shop for 8-10 hours?!
I was able to copy the DataInstall.ini and name only the portions of the data I wanted to install in each session. But then I had to separate the installs into different network folders otherwise you end up overwriting the DataInstall.exe file, which users need for each install in order to register from a network location (for each install).
Needless to say, it took SEVERAL weekends and quite a few mistakes before I was able to do it this way successfully!
Please vote for data installs in smaller portions!
Sometimes we may have polygons, such as county boundaries, and need to split the polygons into smaller areas using polylines, such as roads. Please consider adding a polygon split by lines tool. I imagine it could be like the Poly-Split tool, but accept two inputs of a polygon field and a polyline field.
Alteryx's spatial tools are really powerful and offer a lot of value for analysis. However, when rendering a map for output, there is currently no way to place an image inside of a polygon. This feature would be very useful for customized layers on maps and other spatial-based processes.
My rough suggestion would be to scale a selected image to the size of the polygon's bounding rectangle, and then trim the edges of the image to fit inside the polygon itself.
In the map input tool, it would be really nice if I could type in an address or a geography (like "Boulder County"), and the map would be zoomed to that location, and maybe even draw a point for me (if it is an address) or draw the geography polygon so that I can use that for downstream analysis.
I am using the Distance Tool and would like to get the polyline that represents the drive distance. I need to output the drive polyline for multiple points and determine the percentage of overlap between routes and the number of times overlapped.
I was wondering if anyone else in the community thought it would be a good idea for Alteryx to add the capability to import a Mapinfo raster file? Currently you can work with MapInfo's vector .tab files but you cannot bring into Alteryx MapInfo raster .tab files.
Even if Alteryx is not able to do any spatial calculations on the raster it would still be useful to import a georegistered raster .tab file to allow the user to display lat/long referenced data on top of it. Another way to look at it would be like alowing a user to create and use a custom reference map in the Map Report tool.
I need this functionality because I often need to display lat/long data on top of georegistered .tab floorplans (always created in MapInfo). Currently there seems to be no easy way of doing that. The simple solution would just be able to import them and view . Later if you could do spatial calculations on those files that would be an enormous bonus.
Ability to adjust the underlying speeds on the roadways via the GUI and eliminate having to modify the xml file and registry OR adjust the existing speeds in Guzzler that correspond to the urban roadways to bette reflect traffic volume and the resulting drive time polygons that are created in dense urban areas.
I have found a post where the grid size in the Grid Tool can be update using an interface tool -- which is really wonderful.
What I would love to see is the grid size text entry box being able to accept a field name/variable, so that this can be modified without needing the interface.
This would be useful because I have users uploading shapes to be analyzed -- they don't necessarily know the size of the shape so I would rather the grid size be automatically calculated based on the square mileage of the shape.
I haven’t found a common spatial file format to use between Alteryx, MapInfo Pro and ArcMap. The one file/db type that all 3 software packages have the ability to use is SQLite. Problem is that each of these GIS packages stores data differently in SQLite. I propose the following… Alteryx should have 2 new SQLite options to save output (and read from) in SQLite-ESRI and SQLite-MapInfo. This does not get us to the holy grail of one common file format but does get us down to 2. (If you guys could figure out 1 common format that would be better)
Having these new SQLite formats would fix a common issue shared by the Alteryx supported ESRI and MapInfo formats, namely 2G file limits, multiple files per dataset and short field names. Currently, to save an output for ESRI and Mapinfo, I take a single yxdb and save multiple shape or tab files. The conversion back is an aggregation of individual files into an yxdb. SQLite, as a database, has the ability to store many tables which further reduces files (much like a file geodatabase).
Finally, I have been begging for Alteryx to have the ability to read and write to an ESRI file geodatabase, which seems to never come to fruition. This SQLite solution would eliminate my need to write out to file geodatabases.
I want the ability to select a field from my reference YXDB file in the Map Input tool to color-code the features based on their value. For example, I have a file of store locations, with each record containing last quarter's sales figures. I want to use that file as my reference in the Map Input, and have the points for each stores sized bigger-to-smaller based on their sales. Or another example would be color-coding sales territories/polygons.