The Sharepoint file tools are certainly a step in the right direction, but it would be great to enhance the files types that it is possible to write to sharepoint from Alteryx.
The format missing that I think is probably most in demand is pdf. If we're using the Alteryx reporting suite to create PDF reports, it would be awesome to have an easy way to output these to Sharepoint.
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Alteryx Designer is slow when using In-DB tools.
We use Alteryx 2019.1 on Hive/HortonWords with the Simba ODBC Driver configured with SSL enabled.
Here is a compare In-DB / in Memory :
We found that Alteryx open a new connection for each action :
- First link to joiner = 1 connection.
- Second ling to joiner = 1 connection.
- Click on the canevas = 1 connection.
Each connection take about 2,5 sec... It really slow down the Designer :
Please, keep alive the first connection instead of closing it and creating a new one for each action on the Designer.
I use a mouse which has a horizontal scroll wheel. This allows me to quickly traverse the columns of excel documents, webpages, etc.
This interaction is not available in Alteryx Designer and when working with wide data previews it would improve my UX drastically.
I would like to make some suggestions for future release. I am a big fan of the "retro" alteryx look and would like the option to select that look under User Settings. There should also be some other set themes for user to use. a "Light" version, "Dark" (for the true developer feel) and some grayscale standards or color blind adapted themes.
I have a number of reservations to the new look design (I can put those in a separate post if the team really wants to hear them) but please put the 'retro' button in user settings for me and I will be a happy analyst.
Keep up the good work!!!
Can you add the search functionality in the dropdown (Apps) where the user enters specific text and the dropdown list gets filtered accordingly?
It would enhance the user's experience while using large lists in dropdown.
For a improved presentation of the GUI elements (Inteface Tools), may be to use for an Analytic App.
It would be great if it were possible to position the Interface Tools also side by side, instead of one above the other.
Hi Alteryx Devs -
It would be *really tight* to have a drop down interface tool that would support auto completion based on a odbc connection to a table/column or ajax call. I recently had a situation wherein we need to give the users the ability to select an address, then run a workflow. But the truth is, our address data is terrible, and what I really needed was to be able to let the users start typing the address, then give them a list of choices to pick from, they pick the correct (but usually wrongly formatted) address, and then I send that value into the workflow.
I could not find a decent way to give a gallery user a reliable way to pick an address from our list, so eventually wound up having to write an ajax piece to handle the auto completion, capture the user input, then post to a service that would in turn, interact with gallery through the API, get the response, and send it back calling page, and back to the user. A significant amount of work to put into something that is an exceedingly common web operation of auto completion.
This would make a lot of gallery operations flow so much more naturally.
Thanks for listening!
As a change to Designer UI in 2021.2, when in the filter box, I used to be able to use my mouse to click a little X in the corner to clear the filter or sort that had been implemented and it would immediately clear the filter. It's not working as of 2021.2. Now, I must navigate to the last cascade to get to the word Clear and click on it to clear the filter.
This feels like another very tiny move in the wrong direction. These small UI changes cause 2 or 3 additional steps and slow the diagnostic/navigation process in moving around the Results Grid in the Browse Tool or at any point in the flow where the Results Grid is used.
Can the X in the top level of the Filter/Sort box in the Results Grid be restored in 2021.2?
Related to submission:
Small fix for the UI in the Results Grid (or Browse Tool)
Small Keyboard fix for the browse tool's filter
I always end up sorting after the Summarize tool. It would be nice to have an option to sort on a field in the Actions section of the Sort tool.
I have some fairly long running analytic apps on my private gallery. We have many different users who will run these apps and I would like to send them an email when the app is complete so that they don't have to keep checking back for results.
I came across a few different posts that explained how to use a text input named __cloud:UserId to determine the user id of the person running the app and then to query the MongoDB for that user to retrieve their email address. These posts were very helpful, as I do have it working in my analytic app. However, I tried putting all of this into a macro so that I didn't have to copy/paste every time I needed the current user's email address. Unfortunately, the __cloud:UserId text box does not seem to work if it is in a macro.
I would like to suggest 2 small changes to make working with Interface tools easier:
1) Let a user change the name of Question Constants from the workflow tab. For example, I would love the ability to change the names of my list boxes below. Currently, I can click in the name box and write new names in, but it doesn't stick.
2) Let the user add the value on the Interface tools under the Annotation tab. Currently, I drop an interface tool on, change the name on the annotation tab, and then have to go the the workflow tab to setup a value. It would be easier if the value box was also on the annotation tab:
I would like to see a time interface tool similar to the Date and Numeric Up Down tools. I am working on some macros where the user can select the time they would like to use a filter for the data.
Example: I want all data loaded after 5:00 PM because its late and needs to be removed.
Example 2: I want to create an app where the user can select what time range they would like to see records for (business hours, during their shift, etc)
Currently this require 2-3 numeric up downs or a Text box with directions for the user on how to format field with Error tools to prevent bad entries. It could even be UTC time.
Pardon the length of this post, but I have been working with Alteryx since version 2.0 (11 years) and have been accumulating a wish list ever since. Some of these suggestions have been made in the past but have yet to be embraced. This is the first post for the first 'idea' but, as I said, this is a wish list that has grown since I was first introduced to Alteryx. More posts will follow.
I will break this into sections to hopefully make the suggestions easier to categorize and digest.
Application interface - Since I was introduce to Alteryx, the application interface (what is presented to users) has remained rather stagnant and, with the rumored push to adopt HTML as a replacement for pcxml, could benefit from the following additional settings. I suggest these based on the fact that dot Net classes for interface controls are readily available in Windows which allow for manipulation of each of the controls attributes.
1. The ability to set 'style' attributes for each of the interface tools in the application interface (font-family, font-style, font-size, font-weight, color, etc. This could be presented to the developer as an additional (perhaps optional button) in the Configuration panel for each interface tool as below:
These settings would be specific to the type of interface tool and to how the individual tool would layout and/or be styled relative to the application interface window. One layout option, applicable to most interface tools, would be where the label would be relative to the object itself (top, bottom, left, right). The CSS could be stored in and interpreted from the XML of the yxwz file referencing the ToolID of the Node in a section of the XML hierarchy called <CSS> or something standard. An option to alter the default CSS could be displayed with a radio button control so that if not selected, the tool would fallback to the default system CSS of the tool. This default could also be set in System settings so that a consistent interface could be defined across the enterprise.
2. Moving to the actual window that displays when the application is opened, a lot of the same concepts could be applied to the Interface Designer pane.
Attributes that could be set could include position on screen when opened, width and height of the window, and all the attributes of a dot Net form. The same radio button strategy used for individual interface tools could be employed to use or not use system defaults.
3. In the UI, it would be nice if there was additional flexibility in how the interface tools could be laid out. Along with the relative position of labels for each control, being able to layout controls horizontally as well as vertically would allow for a more organized interface.
The Radio buttons would work as normal with the Text Box controls inside each Radio button and only displaying when the button is selected.
I realize a lot of the current development in Alteryx is focused on the new Alteryx Connect and being able to attach to more data files and services. But, if there is still also a concerted effort to move from what could be considered a legacy proprietary mark up language, pcxml, to a more robust and universally accepted mark up, html and css, then, in my humble opinion, expanding the options for developers to design more user friendly and customizable applications to a standard 'style' across the enterprise, both on the desktop and in the gallery, is a worthy endeavor.
Thanks for your attention. More to follow.
The beauty of workflow constants is that a user can change a value in one place and it will be effective everywhere in the workflow where the constant is used. I want to be able to update the workflow constant value itself using an App interface. If I use interface tools to update the constant value wherever it appears, the constant loses its value and beauty. This becomes a maintenance nightmare and an interface tool clutter. Can I have a new tool or a current tool in the interface palette which allows me to change workflow constants in the interface? Thank you.
I often use user constants in my workflows and ever since the Workflow tab has been buried under the Canvas tab in the Workflow Configuration, I often forget to adjust my constants. Out of sight, out of mind.
My suggestion would be to create a tool that could be placed on the canvas with the constant name in the title area and a text box which shows the current value and allows the user to change the value before processing.
Speed up canvas edits - The Create/Remove Space Tool
Usually day two of working with a canvas I realize that I have been a fool, and I come up with a significantly more elegant or simple solution. Moving all of the containers or tools to fit my slick new container is cumbersome and slow. I've created a GIF of a feature several tools have which allows the user to easily move and arrange items on the canvas.
Open source tool used in demo: bpmnJs
It would be great if the "fields from connected tool" option pulled fresh data at runtime when used in the gallery and pulling data from non-interface tools. The external source option doesn't have many settings (i.e. I can just point to one file), whereas the possibilities would be endless if I could use the full suite of tools to create a data set, at runtime, to pass to the list box/dropdown.
I'd like to be able to disable a tool container but not minimize it so I can still see what's in there. Maybe disabled containers could be grayed out the way the output tools are when you disable them. We would still need to retain current features in case people like it that way, but it would be nice to choose.
It would be nice to be able to set a default date for the Date Interface tool.
Props to @KaneG for the workaround ( http://community.alteryx.com/t5/Publishing-Gallery/Set-Default-Date-for-Date-Interface-Tool/m-p/3573... But I'd like to see something built in to the tool rather than use a workaround every time as the standard. Plus, I enjoy the uniform look of having two date inputs.
Just as a side note while we're on the topic of the Date Interface tool; it is really misleading the way "Today" stays outlined even after you click on a different date. I always second guess if it took my click or not.
Analytical apps currently do not have the ability to provide any indication of progress to users when hosted on the galaxy.
It would be valuable to be able to provide a progress bar or some indication of progress to the user when invoking analytical apps from the gallery.
Alteryx Desktop 2018.4 has a new interface which looks nice, but the labels and texts of its interface is difficult to read (as seen in the below screenshot).
It's seem that the interface's font type or size is not appropriate!
(Knowing that we didn't have any problem with the previous versions of Alteryx Desktop 11.7, 2018.2, & 2018.3)
So, I suggest to change the interface's font type or size of Alteryx Desktop 2018.4 as it was in the previous versions or to another font which is easy to read,
or at least having an option that allow the user to adjust the interface's font type and size.
My solution now is to downgrade to version 2018.3 where I have no problem at all regarding the interface's font.