Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Hello Team,
If we have the flexibility to add new formula any where in the formula tool not just at the bottom of the existing formula's that would be great.
Right now after development if there is change and an additional formula is required which will be input for existing formulas in Formula tool then effort to change is high, if we have the flexibility to add formula at any place in formula tool then the effort will be less.
Alternate Solution : Add one more formula tool before the existing formula tool and include the new formula but i
think if the formula tool has the flexibility to add formula anyplace possible that would be great.
Thank You,
Visali
In this blog post http://www.chaosreignswithin.com/2019/06/alteryx19-nashville-we-turned-it-up-to.html, Mark mentioned there is report of Runner macros not working correctly on Windows 10 Enterprise. So I decided to create test workflows to reproduce this error. I've attached 4 files, which you'll need to download and place in a folder to reproduce this error.
Here is the error I produced. The ListRunnerDriver.yxmd goes into an infinite loop.
Here is the state of the folder is when I aborted the ListRunnerDriver.yxmd.
I wasn’t able to reproduce this error with 1 child workflow, which isn’t how we use List Runner macro. So if you did your testing with 1 child workflow, you would not have seen an error.
After I added a 2nd child workflow is when the error occurred, which is how we typically use List Runner macro, more than 1 child workflows.
NB: I used only List Runner and Log Parser macros from the Crew Macros Pack.
Steps to reproduce the errors:
1. Create a folder
2. Copy all attached files in say folder.
3. Open ListRunnerDriver.yxmd
4. Run ListRunnerDriver.yxmd.
5. Look for errors.
ListRunnerChild.yxmd and ListRunnerChild2.yxmd each are a simple workflow with 2 tools: Text Input and Output tools. They write to 2 different Excel workbooks. In this case, only the ListRunnerChild.yxmd produced an output.
When List Runner macro tried to run ListRunnerChild2.yxmd is when the infinite loop started.
The ListRunnerDriver.Log.xlsx has the messages, but in this case, with the infinite loop and errors, this output is never written.
Right now as far as I know you need to add each DB connection manually. This works... but is quite time consuming when trying to run tasks against a cluster of prod databases. It would be awesome to pass a JSON config file,example below, to the Alteryx Engine and have Alteryx create those connections upon parsing the file. This would save tons of time, and allow teams to share a central config file with consistent aliases across their clusters to ensure their app connections point to the same DBs across workflows. It would also make on boarding a breeze for new developers on team.
In version 2018.1 there was a known issue with the profile visualization for numeric data (y-axis wasn't in order). When that issue occurred, there was also a change to the box & whisker plot.
It used to be that the B&W plot was based on the Mean, but when the issue occurred it was replace with the Median.
It appears that the y-axis order issue has been fixed, however the B&W plot is still based on the Median. Since a B&W plot is always the same for a Median perspective (the Median is ALWAYS in the middle), a plot based on the Mean is much more informative of what the data looks like.
It would be great if the profiling visualization could be reverted back to using the Mean instead of the Median.
Sometimes, when I am working with new data sources, it would be nice to have a dockable pane that would allow me to view the schema of all of my connected data sources. That way I could rename fields and change data types as needed without having to jump from one select tool to the other to see how the schemas compare.
I would like to know the run time user for workflows in Gallery. Possibly changing the run time username in the gallery. I know we could include the credentials at workflow save to gallery but that means I have to open the workflow and change the credentials.Also, we could change the worker process to be run with certain credentials I will have to be admin to be able to do edit worker process setup.
Thanks
Simple idea: why not have a single installer that can install
at the same time given the available security privileges...
When you get an error message in an R tool it's almost impossible for a newbie to figure out what has just happened...
For eg. the normal R package randomForest sets 32 as a max number of classes for a given class variable
Thus when you happen to run randomForest on anything with > 32 classes you get an error, imposssible to figure out without searching on the net or better surfing on the community.
How about a basic rules checker providing message on the configs sayin;
"X" and "Y" variables are categoric and have more than 32 classes,
you have to fix thembefore running an RF tool in order to succeed"
Greetings All,
I recently came across a workflow that has hundreds of tools and I need change a "variable" within several filter tools. There is prob 30-40 filters and they vary in what they filter. A find and replace feature would be awesome, or even a simple find function that shows were the variable is located within a workflow/tool. Could use user constants but these workflows were already made when I joined and it would be more difficult.
So a feature similar to the MS Word feature of search/find/find all/replace/replace all would be great for the actual variables with the tools.
When Alteryx Designer launches, the splash screen forces itself in front of all other windows. For the 1 minute it takes to load it prevents me from doing other things.
Please allow it to be in the background when another application is selected or able to be minimized.
In the same way In-DB generates SQL, might it be possible to have an In-PowerBI and generate DAX?
Hi,
As per our project, we need to publish the image into a PDF file which will be downloaded from web URL. when we download the image from web URL that will be saved as TIF format in our local machine. This TIF format is not being supported by Alteryx.
The tool needs an enhancement (to support TIFF) which can be used for converting tiff format to other format OR directly tiff image should be usable in the report.
Thanks,
Raju Miyapuram
My organization requires users to change their active directory passwords every so often. That's fine. That does create an issue with changing passwords on all workflows that contain a tableau server publish, but that's not the real issue here.
What's more annoying is that once that password is changed, the data source name and project is lost. When updating multiple data sources across workflows (or within the same workflow) this becomes quite cumbersome and annoying.
I know there are limitations on the partner side as this is technically a tableau controlled thing, but is there anything that can be done here?
In previous version of Alteryx, when the user selected records in the Browse tool, a count for those records would show next to the display that shows the total record count. When you separated the windows (Browse map is in one window, Browse data in another) that feature went away on the data side (it still shows in the map view side). The only way to know how many records the user selected to is launch a whole other window showing just the selected records. Could you please bring back the selected records display, like in the attached image?
I´ve looked in the forums, and the idea is new. It would be great if there would be an option to make it possible to give tooltips when writing a formular yourself not only in the "basis-language of the installation", but also in e.g. english (as Lingua Franca). The reasoning: in Excel or Tableau I know many a command in only one language - and have to undergo a timeconsuming process of A) thinking AND B) looking it up in the language you have to use at that project.
Even Tableau does not offer this - and you have to create a lot of calculated fields. Alteryx could gain in UI-friendliness...
I´ve looked in the forums, and the idea is new, although it has similarities to others. Since Alteryx already supports Crtl+c and Crtl+v - why not support "F4" as well. In ALL MS-Office programs it repeats the last step and thus eases the burden on mouse and user...
I realize that repeating a whole process might (!) not be feasible - but single steps (e.g. "Formatting to the similar size like the last item....") would already be very helpful.
Since Tableau does not offer this - and it has a lot more to format and repeat - Alteryx could gain in UI-friendliness...
In the Output Data tool, when the file type is YXDB, one of the options is to Save Source & Description.
Splitting these into "Save Source" and "Save Description" -- independent options -- would be useful.
Sometimes I don't want the file recipient to know how a field was derived but I want to include a description.
Right now there is no easy way of doing this.
Hi,
I recently started to take online trainings on Alteryx and came across Tile Tool. Though could understand the purpose to some extent, it would be great if the tool is explained in more depth along with more examples and also how the tile number is calculated for the examples.
Thanks,
Saipriya.
Occasionally, the Calgary Loader tool will not write out all fields passed to it. This seems to happen after writing out a certain number of fields then later, when rerunning, adding a new output field. Very annoying because you don't know it will happen until processing is complete and you examine the result. I usually manually delete the calgary files prior to rerunning, to avoid the versioning, but it still happens.
Also, please make the versioning optional with a check box, default off.