Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
I'd like to see the DateTimeLastOfMonth and DateTimeFirstOfMonth functions be more flexible then just getting the first or last date of the current month. It would be great if you could point to a date field and have it give the first or last date of that month. i.e DateTimeLastOfMonth([randomdate]) and if the [randomdate] = December 3rd, 1981, the result would bring back 1981-12-31
Hello,
It was be nice if we could see the Regex Tool be a little more interactive. I am thinking a little more similar to the Formula tool where you can have expression display. I often use this site first https://regex101.com/ to practice a Regex formula before applying it. I love how this site highlights the data as you build the expression and also provide a comprehensive quick reference. Just an idea to make it easier for those non Regex experts.
Thanks,
Derek
Hey Community,
How many times do you need to follow a Text to Columns tool with a data cleanse tool? For me it seems almost every time
Wouldn't it be great if Alteryx could incorporate some of the data cleanse functionality into the the Text to Columns?
If you agree VOTE NOW!
Part time Tableau, Part Time Alteryx. Full Time Awesome
To navigate through XML document you need several parse tools to drill down to an element because you can only use element names
It would be nice if you case use an xml path (xpath) because of the rich syntax.
With xpath, we could specify ship_to/address/city or bill_to/address/city
Currently the only encoding method supported by Alteryx Avro format is deflate. Please consider improving this to include google snappy approach.
This codec method is referenced in the Avro documentation for supported codex.
https://avro.apache.org/docs/1.7.6/spec.html#Required+Codecs
The XML Parse tool has a checkbox to ignore errors and continue. This idea works for all options that allow you to ignore errors. It would be great if XML Parse had 2 outputs, 1 for successful records and another for the errored records. This would make it much easier to identify and update (if necessary) errored records.
In my view this would make it more similar to other tools like Filter or Spatial Match where records that don't fit your criteria follow a different flow.
Thanks for considering
With the increase number of JSON feeds and the need to properly define the data type for date and date/time fields. It would be useful to have the Auto Field tool detect common date and date/time formats from Strings and assign the Date, Date Time, or Time data type.
Given the following input data:
The select tool confirms is a String
If we use the Auto Field as:
The result is still a String data type (2nd Select Tool)
I would expect this to be Date Time.
One solution would be to create a formula and parse it, but this is not suitable for situations that the field names are unknown.
It would be much easier to have the work done by Auto Field.
I'm wondering about migrating from SAS DATA STEP to Alteryx tools and R...
Idea is to parse DATA STEP, replace data loading, preperation, filetring, formula and iterative flows with native Altryx tools and
for the rest, PROC's etc will be replaced by R packages... Wouldn't that be like magic?
You should at least have the option to output datetime in a datetime datatype from the DateTimeNow component. Currently it outputs a string so you have to use another component to parse the datetime to datetime datatype.
So in my line of business we get .txt or .dat files that we consider are dump files with customer data in it. The prior record keeper would then provide their layout that determines where certain participant data lives within those files. So currently we have multiple INPUT DATA tools that all parse for different records using the 'Read it as fixed width text file' radio button in the Resolve File Type window and then 'Use Field Settings from File' that we've created from .flat files.
FILE FIELD PARSE 01
FILE FIELD PARSE 02
FILE FIELD PARSE 03
As you can see above each 'RECORD' has a different field setting within the same file. This is fine when it's a few records but we have some prior record keepers that have 15-40 different records within the same dump file. Because of this, our workflows are being bogged down by having to continually open the same file over and over and apply a different file field setting. So I am suggesting we pull Field settings into a separate tool, sort of like a text to column tool but instead of parsing by a specific delimiter it parses by a specific .flat file that contains Field Settings. so instead of our workflow looking like it does above, it would look something like this:
I suggest to add the functionality to parse date strings containing non-English month/day names into Date format
Maybe by detecting the display language of Windows or the language of the DateTime format in Windows settings.
For example, right now in Alteryx, DateTimeParse('July 2008','%B %Y') works fine, but for French month name, DateTimeParse('Juillet 2008','%B %Y') returns null !
and when calling DateTimeFormat(DateTimeNow(), '%B') we would like to have "Juillet" instead of "July" for French version of Windows/DateTime settings.
Right now, we need to use workaround solutions like SWITCH to solve this issue!
I have many monthly financial reports in MS Word that is build up on the same structure (same headings, tables etc.). I would like to import those reports into Alteryx in order to structured and analyse the data in Alteryx and presenting later in Power BI.
A good solution might be a tool that read the word document and input one row for each paragraph, including some paragraph information like style (e.g. Heading 1, Heading 2, Normal, Punctuation etc.). Where there are tables in the document; several fields should be added and separated in Field 1, Field 2... in order to extract and analyse the content of each table.
Ref. also the discussion Input Data from Word document (.docx) and the idea Natively Support PDF as Input.
This might be an edge case, but it would be nice to be able to parse a file using a Regex in the Text to Columns Tool, or specifying a delimiter as a Regex:
Consider the following pandas code where one can easily pull in a file with a bad delimiter
In Alteryx, you would be forced to read in the file with no delimiter, and set the field length to be extremely long, and parse out the contents manually.
filename = "http://daniels-pull.universityofdenv.netdna-cdn.com/assets/GeneralOccurrencesAll.csv"
df = pd.read_csv(filename, sep=r',(?!\s)')
For the split to rows function on text to columns, can we have an option in the configuration to warn/error on too many records being generated just like the append fields tool but replace the words appends with splits?
Hello,
when parsing XML data, Alteryx does not recognise <![CDATA as being data. This type of XML file is not very common yet is still used today (by me anyway!). Their role is similar to commenting your code in some regards (for those who code).
Could it be possible to add a functionality to alteryx so that we can have it consider the data between these "tags" to be data?
Regards,
Julien
Was thinking with my peers at work that it might be good to have join module expanded both for desktop and in-database joins.
As for desktop join: left and right join shows only these records that are exclusive to that side of operation. Would it be possible to have also addition of data that is in common?
As for in-db join: db join acts like classic join (left with matching, right with matching data). Would it be possible to get as well only-left, only-right join module?
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
7 | |
5 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 |