The Alteryx Community is a finalist in three 2026 CMX Awards! Help us win Customer Support Community, Most Engaged Community, and User Group Program of the Year - vote now! (it only takes about 2 minutes) before January 9.
ACT NOW: The Alteryx team will be retiring support for Community account recovery and Community email-change requests Early 2026. Make sure to check your account preferences in my.alteryx.com to make sure you have filled out your security questions.
Learn more here
or even the "_0" prefix would suffice if we are sticking with a 0 based id system. My only thought is that it would have to have some sort of lookahead function in the output tool so that if there isn't supposed to be a 2nd file, then keep the naming structure minus the suffix. That way we don't get a single file with MyFileName_1.csv as the output. that would be ideal i think. Or @MarqueeCrew (#DataTrendsetter) would you rather output the _1 to the first and only file?
Definitely could be a crew macro - probably even better functionality that way anyway - can all of the output options be exposed though... hmmm just thinking - it'd be cool if a macro could have the same output options as the output tool (as a question)...
All output methods are numbered. But numbered databases shouldn't be supported. I think that flat, csv are the primary use cases. Which others do you think?
We appreciate your idea and feedback! We strive to improve our product and insure our users are being heard. Make sure to check out our Submission Guidelines and check out ideas submitted by other users and the other idea boards.