In this case, I would only like to keep Description CC rows. Appreciate any help!
Description | Entity Acct | FileName | Base Amount |
AA | 54545 | CCC | 150 |
AA | 54545 | CCC | -150 |
BB | 45444 | ddd | 180 |
BB | 45444 | ddd | -180 |
CC | 52111 | ffffff | 2456 |
CC | 52111 | serfd | 2365 |
Solved! Go to Solution.
@MiroWEX one way of doing this with the join tool
Thank you both for your help! Since I have a large dataset, both of these solutions aren't providing the correct results (your solutions are great but mainly because I did not notice some nuisances with the data).
Binuacs, I am reviewing your workflow but since i have 40000+ rows the join tool is returning 4+ million rows... I think the issue is that I have many of the same Descriptions, Entity Acct, and File name records where the base amount is the the only difference.
Luke, for your workflow, I missed the fact that my data has some entries share the same Description, Entity Acct, and File Name but have different amounts that are not offsetting. As a result, the Summarize tool doesn't bring the total to zero.
Example for
Description | Entity Acct | FileName | Base Amount |
AA | 54545 | CCC | 150 |
AA | 54545 | CCC | -150 |
AA | 54545 | CCC | 1300 |
BB | 45444 | ddd | 180 |
BB | 45444 | ddd | -180 |
BB | 45444 | ddd | 300 |
CC | 52111 | serfd | 2365 |
CC | 52111 | ffffff | 2456 |
so the results would look like this
AA | 54545 | CCC | 1300 |
BB | 45444 | ddd | 300 |
CC | 52111 | serfd | 2365 |
CC | 52111 | ffffff | 2456 |
Hi @MiroWEX
What would your expected outcome be in that scenario, then? I think it would still effectively remove the netting records.
Thanks everyone! CoGs solution worked perfectly!
User | Count |
---|---|
63 | |
32 | |
28 | |
24 | |
23 |