Passing Fields to Macro Input Tool

Hi All,

I’ve created some Alteryx macros before, but it just confuses me because sometimes when I pass only one field onto a macro with only one input in it. It will output all the fields from the source tool.

In below screenshot, there are 7 fields with the first one being the “Product Code”

I’ve setup the macro input tool to accept one field only named “Field”

Now when I try to see how the data looks like by just connecting a Macro Output tool directly from the Macro Input, it shows all the fields from the source tool. But it renames the first field to “Field” instead of “Product Code”. I understand the renaming of the first field, but what I don’t understand is that why does it displays all the fields even if only one field is being passed.

In addition, even though the other fields are being passed, only one column is being detected from the connected tools. In this case, the Select tool that is being connected to the Macro Input detects the “Field” that is being setup inside the Macro input, but not the other columns.

Also, the Formula tool can’t detect the other fields.

Why does Alteryx behave like this?

Also, is there a way that I could access the other fields from the Select, Formula, or other tools like Filter, etc.?

Macros

Accepted answers

All comments

AncientPandaman

the interface just means to map the field if field name is different, you can try to add more field in macro input.

for my experience, before develop macro better to ensure input from data stream structure is same with macro input.

so mostly I will copy some sample data from data stream to macro input as start and develop as normal workflow.

hope it clarify.

Amol_Telore

Hey @ricoo

In Macro Input connector, we specify the incoming data structure.
From the description you have given, it seems like Macro input tool has only one field i.e., "Field1".
That is why in the formula (Within macro), you only see one column "Field1". Cause in incoming metadata has only one field.

Answering your first question,
Macro Input tool has one property, map incoming field.
When this option is selected, you will get a drop-down button to map the incoming data (from parent workflow) with whatever columns you have specified in Macro Input tool.
If you have five columns specified in macro input, you will get 5 drop down and vice versa.
In your case, you have one field thus you are getting only one drop down.

Having this drop down, does not mean that it will remove other columns (from the dataset coming from parent workflow) that are not selected in drop down.
It means that it will simply map "Product Code" to "Field1" within Macro and will also read additional columns from incoming dataset if any.

@MeganBowers has created a detailed blog on Macro and Analytic Applications. You may find this helpful.

Apps and Macros Guide - Alteryx Community

Regards,

Amol Telore

ricoo

Hi @PangHC @Amol_Telore

Yes you're right. I’ve done macros before wherein I have to setup specifically multiple fields in the Macro Input tool to accept incoming data with the same number/structure of fields. But when I found out that, a Macro Input tool can also pass all the fields to a Macro Output tool even if only one field has been specified on dropdown, I intentionally setup only one field in the Macro Input tool. My goal is to dynamically read all the fields being passed, and check if the values within the passed fields are NULL.

AncientPandaman

@ricooto check empty fields

you may use transpose + summary.
Screenshot 2023-09-07 161950.png

ricoo

@PangHC I will try. Thanks!

ricoo

Hi @PangHC

Sorry, but my problem is about looping through all fields that are being passed on the Macro Input tool. That's why I used the multi-field formula to determine if a field is NULL. If it's null then I'm going to concatenate all of the NULL fields into one column. This problem seems to be very complicated. I guess I should stick to setting up the Macro Input with the specific columns that I need instead of having it to accept dynamically.

AncientPandaman

@ricoo why you concatenate the empty field? i think you want to know which field is blank.

here the example workflow to remove empty field. second browse tool to review the empty field.

Screenshot 2023-09-11 101207.png

remove empty field.yxmd

ricoo

Hi @PangHC I now have discarded this approach. It was just too complicated. I've decided to concatenate all fields before passing it into a macro though by using the approach mentioned in this topic:

https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Designer-Desktop-Discussions/Concatenate-All-Fields-Dynamically/m-p/1184632#M293667

It's still a work in progress, but I'll have to continue using this approach moving forward.

Quick Links

This months top contributors

atcodedog05 19458

Qiu 15866

binu_acs 15708

MarqueeCrew 13708

apathetichell 13703