Macro output update
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Hi All,
I'm working on a macro which map 4 optional fields as input and gives output as Optional_Field_1,Optional_Field_2 etc. Is there any way to replace the standard header with the raw data header?
Macro Interface
Current Output
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
- Batch Macro
- Macros
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
I am struggling to understand what you refer to with "the standard header" and "the raw data header" respectively.
Could you attach the macro you are working on?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Will the Dynamic Rename of the columns which takes "Take Field Names from Right Input Rows" help? The Raw Headers will be the right input. Still trying to understand your query.
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Thanks for the reply :)
The macro is set up to perform various calculations using the mean and standard deviation inputs from a sample of data and output the results. Additional fields in the data are relevant but are not used in calculations. I selected those fields and mapped them as Optional Fields 01, 02, etc. Consider a scenario in which the data contains the fields "Region" and "Country." I am now mapping these as Optional Fields_01 and Optional Field_02, and in the macro output, I can see the values under the headings Optional Field 01 and Optional Field 02. However, I require 'Region' and 'Country' as headers from the real data for the output.
Apologies for not sharing the macro since it contains confidential info.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Hi @Vivek007ktd ,
Thanks for the explanation.
I understand you want to let the user select the field name and keep the field name as it is.
I am still not sure why you want to store the selected fields in different names ("Optional_Field_1" etc.),
as you do not need to rename it if you just want to output.
For example, you can pass the field name to Dynamic Select tool as below.
If this is not what you mean, please ignore this post.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
@Jishnu_k
Thanks. I used the logic from your workflow, and it was perfect.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Hi @Yoshiro_Fujimori,
Appreciate your help on this :)
