Hi SME,
I have a workflow that's reallocating any negative value to one year forward and one year backward setting the 1 year backward/forward to zero if they're negative. This is shown in the three examples shown in the Excel file.
What I struggle with is the case where I have more than one year with negative values in a given tile. If I were to filter for tile #3, then my batch macro would work since it only has to deal with one negative amount to be re-allocated. If I were to filter it for tile #2, then I would run issues of having to figure out how to deal with multiple negative items to be re-allocated (rows 6 & 7).
I was thinking of using an Iterative macro to embed in this Batch macro to see if that works. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
kwl
Working with batch macros in an iterative way can get confusing fast, especially when the tool keeps looping without producing the expected output. I like how the thread breaks down the need to separate iteration logic from the batch process itself. Building a smaller prototype flow first usually helps spot where the macro hands data back, so you can adjust the interface tools before scaling the whole thing up.
The iterative macro is essentially a FOR loop in code. You can nest them just fine, but you need to know what is getting passed in and out and have a good design so you don't get yourself lost.
Let me know if you come across desire solution, I would love to know how you have designed an Iterative macro to embed in a Batch macro
@Hasanparvez - I haven't been able to work on this because I discovered what I'm feeding into the batch macro is not complete. For tile #142, I have 78 records going in but 5 fell off. Any ideas what could have caused this?
@Hasanparvez - Figured this out...Has to do with configuring the Output Mode to Auto Configure by Name.
@Hasanparvez - Do you have any suggestions on how to approach the original problem without using an iterative macro?
