Hi Community,
We have many Label codes for each product type. For Pear, I only need keep the record for Label Code "A" and "B". For the rest of Type, no need to filter out any Label code. Could Alteryx help.
| Type | Label Code |
| Apple | A |
| Apple | B |
| Apple | C |
| Apple | F |
| Orange | A |
| Orange | B |
| Orange | C |
| Pear | A |
| Pear | B |
| Pear | C |
| Pear | D |
The desire outcome would be
| Type | Label Code |
| Apple | A |
| Apple | B |
| Apple | C |
| Apple | F |
| Orange | A |
| Orange | B |
| Orange | C |
| Pear | A |
| Pear | B |
Solved! Go to Solution.
Here you go:
Follow the [F]alse path once done.
Inverse logic is always a little mind-bending, but you identify what you want to carve out, then just follow the false path of the filter tool. Hope that helps, -Jay
Thank you, @dreldrel for the response, however, I would caution against the use of the data-cleanse tool due to its tendency to slow down workflows and clog up memory. The general assumption for this solution is that the author has already tailored their workflow to account for general cleansing activities but just needs help with the logical components, applied against their dummy-data.
-Jay
Thanks so much for the solution.

